The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq.

About this Item

Title
The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq.
Author
Blount, Thomas, 1618-1679.
Publication
London :: Printed for T. Twyford, and are to be sold by Hen. Twyford ...,
1670.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Bankruptcy -- Great Britain.
Fraudulent conveyances -- Great Britain.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A28470.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A28470.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Page 154

Mich. 6 Jac. Regis.

Taylor and Shoyl's Case.

Taylor informed upon the Statute, 5 Eliz. cap. 4. Tam pro Dom. Rge qua prose, in the Exchequer: That the Defendant had used the Art and Mystery of a Brewer, &c. and averred, That Shoyl the Defendant did not exercise the Art or Mystery of a Brewer, at the time of making the Act, nor had been Apprentice 7 years, &c. The Defendant demurred in Law, upon the Informa••••on, and Judgment was given against him by the Barons. And now in this Term, upon a Writ of Errour, the Matter was argued at Sergeants Inne before the two Chief Justi∣ces: And two matters were moved.

1. One, That a Brewer is not within the said Branch of the said Act; for the words are, That it shall not be lawful to any Persons, other than such as now use lawful∣ly any Art, Mystery, or Manual Occupation, to set up or use any Art, Mistery, or Manual Occupation, except he shall have been brought up therein 7 years at least as an Apprentice. And 'twas said, That the Trade of a Brewer is not any Air, Mistery, or Manual Occupation within the said Branch, because it is easily and presently lear∣ned, and needs not 7 years Apprenticeship to learn the sam, it being every Country Housewifes Work: And the Act of H. 8. is, That a Brewer is not a Handicraft Artificer.

2. It was moved, That the said Averment was not sufficient; for it ought to be as general, as the Exception in the Statute is.

1. To the first, it was Resolved, That the Trade of a Brewer, viz. To hold a Common Brewhouse, to sell Beer or Ale to another, is an Art and Mystery within the said Act: for in the beginning of it, it is Enacted, That no Person shall be retained for less time than a whole year in any the Services, Grafts, Mysteries, or Arts of Cloath∣ing,

Page 155

&c. Bakers, Brewers, &c. Cooks &c. Upon which words in the said Branch, the Information is grounded: Also, because every Housewife brews for her private use; so also she bakes and dresseth meat; yet none can hold a Common Bakehouse, or Cooks Shop, to sell to others, unless he hath been an Apprentice, &c. And the Act 22 H. 8. c. 13. is explained, That a Brewer, Baker, Surge∣on, and Scrivener, are not Handicrafts mentioned in cer∣tain penal Laws; but the same doth not prove, but they are Arts or Mysteries.

2. As to the second, it was Resolved, That the Inten∣tion of the Act was, that none should take upon him any Art, but he who hath Skill or knowledg in the same: for, Quod quisque norit in hoc se exerceat. And so the first Judg∣ment was affirmed.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.