The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq.

About this Item

Title
The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq.
Author
Blount, Thomas, 1618-1679.
Publication
London :: Printed for T. Twyford, and are to be sold by Hen. Twyford ...,
1670.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Bankruptcy -- Great Britain.
Fraudulent conveyances -- Great Britain.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A28470.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The resolutions of the judges upon the several statutes of bankrupts as also, the like resolutions upon 13 Eliz. and 27 Eliz. touching fraudulent conveyances / by T.B., Esq." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A28470.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Page 407

Mich. 7 Jac. Regis.

In an Ejectione Firmae, he Writ and Declaration were of two parts, of certain Lands in Hetherset and Windham, in the County of Norfolk; and saith, not in two parts, in three parts to be divided: and yet it was good as well in the Declaration as the Writ: for without question the Writ is good, de duabus partibus, generally, and so is the Register. See the 4 E. 3. 162. 2 E. 3. 31. 2 Ass. 1. 10 Ass. 12. 10 E. 3. 511. 11 Ass. 21. 11 E. 3. Bre. 478. 9 H. 6. 36. 17 E. 4. 46. 19 E. 3. Bre. 244. And upon all the said Books it appears, that by the Intendment and Con∣struction of the Law, when any parts are demanded, without shewing in how many parts the whole is divided, that there remains but one part undivided. But when any Demand is of other parts in other form, there he ought to shew the same specially. And according to this dif∣ference, it was resolved in Jordan's Case in the Kings-Bench; and accordingly Judgment was given this Term in the Caseat Bar.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.