Page 28
ANNO DOM. 1521. REG. 13.
EDward Stafford Duke of Buckingham was about this time ar∣raigned [ 1521] of high Treason. He was descended of a Family, which whether it was more antient or noble, is questionable.* 1.1 He derived himself by a direct line from Robert de Stafford, to whom William the Conquerour gave large revenues, which his posterity greatly enlarged, by matching with the Heirs female of many noble Families. By the Lady Ann, Daughter to Thomas of Wood∣stock Duke of Glocester, who was Brother to Edward the Third, he participated of the Blood Royal. The first honourable Title of the Family was of Lord Stafford, the next of Earl of Stafford, as was Edmund, that married the Daughter to Thomas of Woodstock. Hum∣phrey Son to Edmund was created Duke of Buckingham by Henry the Sixth, who left that Honor to his Son Humphrey, who was Grand∣father to this Edward by his Son Henry the third Duke. How Henry assisted the Usurper Richard the Third, in oppressing Edward the Fifth, how he after conspired with the Earl of Richmond (after∣wards Henry the Seventh) against the Usurper, but was cut off by the Tyrant before he could bring any thing to pass; the Histo∣ries of those times declare. Edward his Son restored to Blood and Dignities by Henry the Seventh, for his Descent, Wealth, and Honors, inferiour to none but the King, not content with this, was by N. Hopkins a Charterhouse-Monk induced to believe that Heaven had decreed to cut off King Henry, after whose death he should reign, and the Crown be for ever established on his poste∣rity. This the Monk affirmed, God the Governour of all things, had revealed unto him. He further advised him by liberality and courtesie to win the minds of the people, for the time was at hand wherein this should certainly come to pass, if it were not through his own default. The Duke (no sot, but blinded by ambition) gave such credit to the Monk, who was either mad, or else flattered him in hope of reward, that although the time prefixed for these Miracles were past, yet was he still in hope, fed the Impostor with gifts, who fed him with air, secretly vili∣fied the King, and gave profusely to all. Nay he could not for∣bear, but at length he must brag of the Jugler's promises, as he did to a Gentleman named Charles Knevet, to whom he boldly unmasked himself, and gave a reason of his actions. Upon Kne∣vet's accusation he was arraigned, and condemned the thirteenth of May, and on the seventeenth publickly beheaded. His death was lamented by many, and the rather for that he was no way faulty, but in his vanity and pride, which overthrew him. Being a child, I have heard antient men say, that by his bravery of Ap∣parel, and sumptuous Feasts he exasperated the King, with whom in these things he seemed to contend. But he could by no means