The cry of the oppressed from under their oppressions, ascending up to Him, who will rebuke the oppressor and devourer, and deliver the innocent some of the sufferings of the people of God, called Quakers, concerning tythes and oaths, &c. : by the branches which are a new springing forth of the remainder of the bitter root of Episcopacy, which yet remaineth unplucked up in the rigid presbytery ...

A brief Declaration of some of the Oppressions and Sufferings of those people the World in scorn calls QUAKERS, in the No∣thern parts, who daily suffer the spoyling of their Goods, and imprisonment of their Persons, by reason they cannot for conscience sake pay Tythes, and other customary dues (as they are called) Ob∣lations, Obversions, Easter-reckonings, Mortua∣ries, and such like Popish Inventions; so that they are daily drawn before the Judgment Seats, and re∣quired to answer the unjust demands of their Ac∣cusers, upon their oathes, thereby endeavouring to ensnare them, who for conscience sake cannot swear at all, their souls being made subject to the Commands of Christ Jesus, who saith, Swear not at all, but in all your communication let your yea be yea, and your nay, nay, for whatsoever is more than these, cometh of evil.

As likewise the names of several others, in other parts of the Nation, who are sued for Tythes.

In the County of Cumberland.

Graystock Parish.

RIchard Peacock, for Tyth of the value of 8 s. 4 d. had taken from him for Richard Gilpin Priest of Graystock, one Mare apprized by those that took her away at 2 l. 6 s. 8 d.

John Slee, for Tythes of the value of 6 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, one brass Pot woth 16 s.

The same, for Tyth of the value of 14 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, five Sheep worth I l. 2 s. 6 d. one of them being another mans.

Margaret Slee Widdow, and Richard Slee her son, for Tyth of the value of 8 s. had taken from them for the said Priest Gilpin, four Sheep worth 18 s.

Agnes Buckbarrow, Tho Buckharrow, and Rich. Buck∣barrow, for Tyth of the value of 16 s. had taken from them for the said priest Gilpin, one Steare worth I l. 16 s.

John Mark, for Tyth of the value of 6 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, seven pewter Platters worth a 11 s.

The same, for Tyth of the value of I l. 3 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, one milch Cow, worth I l. IOS.

John Todhunter, for Tyth of the value of 1 s 10 d. had ta∣ken from him for the said Gilpin, one brasse Potworth 10 s.

The same, for Tyth of the value of 4 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, another Pot, and two pewter Plat∣ters, worth 18 s.

Tho. Slee, for Tyth of the value of 8 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, two stone of Wool worth 14 s.

These were taken away by Warrant from the Justices, up∣on the oath of a man that lived five miles from some of them, and that knew not their Goods, but swore what he heard reported.

Jo. Bewley, for Tyth of the value of 19 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, three brasse Pots, and five pewter Platters worth 4 l. 10 s.

Iohn Sowerby, for Tyth of the value of 6 B. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, one Pot worth 12 s.

Io: Udall, for Tyth of the value of 4 s. had taken from him for the said Gilpin, one brasse Pot, and one Pan woth 13 s. 8 d.

Richard Peacock, for Tyth of the value of 1 l. 4 d. had taken from him for the said Priest, one Horse worth 2 l.

Tho. Barker, for Tyth of the value of 14 s. 2 d. had taken from him for the said Priest, one Horse worth 2 l.

Iohn Goodhouse, for Tyth of the value of 9 s. had taken from him for the said Priest, one Mare worth 2 l.

All these suffered by the said Gilpin, who is a chief Priest in Cumberland, and a Tryar of others.

Caldb••ck Parish, Richard Hutton Priest.

William Stalker, for Tyth of the value of 9 s. had taken from him by Justices Writ, for the use of the said Hutton, two Cows and two Oxen worth 8 l. 10 s.

Richard Williamsox, for Tyth of the value of 5 s. 9 d. was imprisoned several months, and had taken from him, for the use of the said Hutton, one Heifer worth 35 s.

Richard Nicholson, for Tyth of the value of 10 s. which they say was due, had taken from him for the said Priest, one Cow worth 50 s.

Iohn Nicholson, for Tyth of the value of 9 s: had taken from him for the use of the said Priest, one Ox worth. 33 s. 4 d.

Tho. Bewley, for Tyth of the value of 14 s: had taken from him for the use of the said Priest, a Cow worth 40 s.

Iohn Stricket, for Tyth of the value of 10 s. had taken from him for the said Preist, one Cow worth 30 s.

Mungo Ancock, for Tyth of the value of 10 s: had taken from him for the use of the said Preist, one Heiser worth 26 s: 8 d.

Iohn Pattinson, for Tyth of the value of 8 s: 4 d. had ta∣ken from him for the use of the said Priest, one Cow worth 30 s.

Iohn Askne, for Tyth of the value of 3 s. 10 d. had ta∣ken from him for the use of the said Priest, one Cow worth 30 s.

Iohn Bewley, For Tythes of the value of 19 s. had goods taken from him for the use of the said Priest worth 50 s.

Richard Banks, For Tythes of the value of 10 s: and 5 s.

of it in another Priests time, had taken from him for the use of the said Priest, Pans, Pots, and pewter Platters worth 21 s.

Thomas Mark, For Tyth of the value of 13 s: had taken from him by a Justices Writ from London, for the said Hut∣ton, three Cows and two Oxen, worth near 10 l.

George Rothery, For Tythes claimed by the said Priest, was cast into prison at Carlile, and there lay for many months.

And from several others was Brasse, Pewter, and other Goods taken at under worth, and carried away at their own rating: These Goods and Chattle were taken and car∣ried away by Warrant from two Justices, by which the Priests Servants entred into mens houses and fields, and took Goods according to their own pleasure and carried them a∣way, and the said Priest caused some to be killed for his own use, and others to be sold, and the rest he kept.

All these suffered by one Preist.

Bolton Parish, John Forward Priest.

Tho: Porter, For Tyth of the value of 6 s: 8 d: had taken from him for the said Preist, or his Farmers, one Mare worth 2 l: 13 s: 4 d.

Iohn Wilkinson, For Tyth of the value of 4 s: had taken from him for the same, one Cow worth 50 s.

Iohn Pattinson, For Tyth of the value of 6 s: had taken from him for the same, one Cow worth 38 ••: or above.

Iohn VVilkinson, For Tythes prized to a 11 s. by the Priests Tyth gatherers, who prized the like quantity in ano∣ther mans hand but to 6 s: had taken from him by them 18 l. weight of Brasse, and some Pewter, and 100 sheaves of Big Barley, a great part of that he had: with which Injustice some of the Justices were acquainted, but no relief could be had.

Uldale Parish, Henry Fallow∣field Priest.

William Caipe. For Tyth of the value of 25 s: 10 d: which the Priest demanded, had taken from him by the Constable and the Priest servants, by a Warrant from the Justices, one Mare worth more than 3 l.

Tho: Fell, For 10 s: 4 d: demanded by the Priest, had taken from him by the said Constable, and Priests servants, one Mare worth 45 s.

Iohn Caipe, For 5 s: demanded by the Priest, had taken from him by the said Constable and Priests servants, four Sheep worth 13 s.

Mathew Caipe, For 17 s: demanded by the Priest, had taken from him by the same Constable and Priests servants, one Mare worth 3 l.

Tho: Fell, For 16 s: which the Priest swore his Tythes worth, had taken from him for the said Priest, one Cow worth more than 30 s.

Iohn Caipe, For Tythes had taken from him Brasse at the will of the said Priest upon his own oath; and the said Priest had sued many more at the Law, and here is the fruit of his Ministry.

Iohn Fell elder, For Tythes of the value of 23 s: had taken from him for the said Priest, 176 pounds of Wool.

Tho: Fell, For Tyth of the value of 10 s: had taken from him for the said Priest, 27 l: of Pewter.

Iohn Caipe, For Tyth of the value of 12 s: 8 d: had taken from him for the said Priest Corn and Sacks worth 24 s.

George Scot, For Tyth of the value of 9 s: had taken from him three Sheep.

Tho: Harrison, For Tyth of the value of 9 s: 1 d: had ta∣ken from him for the use of George Tyball Priest of Skelton, one pair of Cart Wheels worth 21 s: 6 d.

Iohn Bank, For Tyth of the value of 18 s: had taken from him for the said Priest, one Pot, one Pan, five Pewter dishes worth 26 s: 8 d.

Richard Ireland of Tho: Close, For Tyth of the value of 8 s: had taken from him for the use of Iohn Jackson, Priest of Hut∣ton in the Forrest, one Caldron, one Pot, one Beetle, one Pan, two pewter Dishes, a pewter Sawcer, and one Salt∣seller, worth 59 s: or more.

Mungo Bewley, For Tyth of the value of 14 s: had taken from him for the use of Lady Fletcher (so called) one Mare worth 3l.

Henry Loathaise, was sued at the County Court, by James Steward Priest of Westward for a Tyth Pigg, he having a Sow which had six Piggs, and recovered 10 s: for it, and a and a Baliff came into the Market and took a Sack and one bushel of Oates Cumberland measure, worth 4 s.

James Barne, For Tythes of the value of 12 s: had taken from him for the use of Rowland Nichols, Priest of Aiceton, Corn and Sacks to the value of 25 s. and upwards.

Matthew Kirkbride, For Tyth of the value of 12 d. being a very poor man, had Goods taken out of his house worth 12 s. for the use of John Pattison Priest of Kirkbride.

Peter Head of Pardsey, For the value of 12 s. had a Horse worth 3 l. taken from him.

Widdow Head of Pardsey, For Tyth of the value of 22 s. had two Mares worth 6 l. 10 s. taken from her by a Justices Writ, for the use of Iohn Wind.

Mungo Wilson of Bugham, For Tythes of the value of 7 S. according to the rate of the Town, had taken from him by Warrant from two Justices, one Cow worth 40 s. for the use of George Fletcher called Baronet, or his Farmers.

Rich. Whiney, For Tythes of the value of 7 s. as aforesaid, had taken from him by the said Warrant, one Cow worth 37 s. for the use of the said Fletcher or his Farmers.

Will. Allisin, For Tythes of the value of 7 s. as aforesaid, had taken from him for the use of the said persons, one Cow worth 36 s.

Anthony Scrugham, For Tythes of the value of 3 s. 4 d. as

aforesaid, had taken from him, for the use of the said per∣sons, one young Colt worth 24 s.

James Wilson, For Tythes of the value of 22 s. as afore∣said, had taken from him for the use of the said persons two Oxen and one Steare, worth 6 l. 10 s. or more.

Ellin Emmerson, upon having but three Geese, had one of them taken from her, for the use of George Flet∣cher, called Baronet.

Alexander Stamper, For Tyth under the value of 40 s. had taken from him for the use of John Salkeld of Threapland, two Oxen worth 5 l.

Tho. Walker, Because he did not set out his Tyth, had his whole Crop of Corn entred upon, and detained by the said Salkeld, to the great disabling of him.

Leo Fisher, For want of seven Stouks of Tyth Bigg, had Brasse and Pewter taken from him, for the use of Henry Pearson, worth 20 s. though the said Pearsons servants, took nine Stouks of Oates more than their due.

John Fell, For want of one Stouk of Bigg, had Brasse ta∣ken from him worth 5 s. when the Stouk of their own ac∣count, was but worth 7 d.

George Rothery, After he had suffered near twelve months imprisonment, because he could not pay Tythes, valued at but 1 s. 9 d. had Goods taken from him afterwards for the said Tythes, worth 6 s

Iohn Iredell, For want of nine Stouks of Corn, had Oates and Sacks taken away, for the use of Gawen Egglesfield Priest of Plimland worth 20 s.

Lamphigh Parish, Comfort Starre Priest.

Will. Bowman, For Tyth of the value of 16 s. had taken from him for the said Priest, one Cow worth 2 l. 6 s. 8 d. and two Pewter Dishes more, worth 8 s. 8 d.

Lorton.

Tho. Head, For Tyth of the value of 24 s. had taken from him by Bayliffs by a Justices Writ, for the use of one Iohn Winder a Tyth-monger; two Horses worth 7 l. or 8 l. which they keep, though they had taken the fourth part of the Tyth before, and since he hath had taken from him for the said Tyth, one Cow worth 40 s.

Wigton.

Will. Pearson, For Tyth of the value of 2 s. 8 d. had taken from him for the use of one called Lady Fletcher, one Horse worth 3 l. and for 3 s. had a Ketle taken away worth 22 s.

John Richardson, For 12 s, demanded for her for Tyth, had taken away, one Cow worth 40 s. and some Pewter Dishes and Yarne.

Graystock Parish.

John Slee, For Tyth of the value of eighteen shillings, had taken away one Cow prised at forty shillings.

The same, For twelve pence, had taken from him 3 pans, 3 pewter dishes, a small piece of pewter, and some Wollen yarn, worth ten shillings.

John Mark the elder, For Tyth of the value of seventeen shillings, had two Cowes taken from him, prised at four pounds.

John Mark younger, For Tyth of the value of twenty one shillings four pence, had taken from him one Cow, one brass Kettle, one pan, one plate, a Cann, a pewter dish, and an Ax, prised at fifty eight shill. four pence.

John Soverly, For Tyth of the value of four shillings, had

one Table, and Frame, and a Chair taken from him worth ten shill. six pence.

John Todhunter, For Tyth of the value of nine shillings eleven pence, had a load of Oats and Sack taken away, worth twenty shillings.

Widow Buckbarrow and her two Sons, For Tyth of the value of eighteen shillings nine pence half peny, had taken a∣way one Cow, one brass pot, and a pan prised at two pound five shillings.

John Bewley, For Tyth of the value of nineteen shillings six pence, had taken from him one Horse worth two pound five shillings.

Widow Slee and Richard Slee, For Tyth of the value of e∣leven shillings two pence, had taken away two Chaldrons, four pewter dishes, two pans, and a sack worth twenty eight shillings.

Thomas Slee, For Tyth of the value of seven shillings, had taken f••om him six pewter dishes, eight fleeces of wooll, and a Bed coverled worth twenty shill.

Cuthbert Hodgson, For Tyth of the value of fourteen shillings, had taken from him one Cow worth thirty five shill.

John Sowerby, For Tyth of the value of fourteen shillings, had taken from him a Mare well worth four pounds.

Caldbeck Parish.

John Stricket, For Tyth of the value of sixteen shil∣lings, had taken from him one Cow, worth fifty shil∣lings.

Richard Wilson, For a rate Tyth of the value of one shil∣ling farthing, had goods taken from him worth seven shil∣lings.

Thomas Hasken, For Tyth of the valve of two shillings four pence, had Goods taken from him worth six shillings eight pence.

John Hasken, For Tyth of the value of twelve shillings

seven pence, had Goods taken from him worth forty shil∣lings.

John Peacock, For Tyth of the value of twenty two shil∣lings two pence, had Goods taken away worth thirty seven shill.

George Scott, For Tyth of the value of fifteen shillings, had Goods taken away worth eighteen shillings eight pence.

John Relfe, For Tyth of the value of five shillings three pence, had taken from him as many Sheep as were worth thirty shill.

William Slalker, For Tyth of the value of eight shillings three pence, had Goods taken from him worth twenty shil∣lings.

Thomas Mark, For Tyth of the value of twenty two shillings four pence, had Goods taken from him worth fifty four shill.

John Nicholson, For Tyth of the value of twelve shillings eight pence, had Goods taken from him worth forty shil∣lings.

Richard Scott, For Tyth of the value of four shillings ten pence, had Goods taken from him worth seven shil∣lings.

Widow Preslman, For Tyth of the value of eight shil∣lings three pence, had Goods taken away worth twenty shill. three pence.

Thomas Bewley, For Tyth of the value of twenty eight shill. six pence, had Goods strained worth three pounds six shill.

Thomas Rickerby, For five pence half peny demanded for smoak passing up his Chimny, had Goods taken away worth two shill. six pence.

Other Goods were taken from John Pattison, Richard Williamson, and others, but the particulars we know not yet.

Brigham Parish.

William Richardson, For Tyth of the value of thirty shill. four pence, had one Horse taken from him worth three pounds ten shill.

Henry Johnson, For Tyth of the value of thirteen shillings nine pence, had one Horse taken from him worth two pound thirteen shill. four pence.

John Gill, For Tyth of the value of thirteen shill. four pence, had one Horse taken from him worth two pounds ten shill.

Cockermouth Parish.

Richard Nuckham, For Tyth of the value of three shill. six pence, had a Horse taken from him worth two pound thirteen shill. four pence.

And also he had taken from him, two brass pots worth fourteen shill. six pence, because he could not for Conscience sake contribute to repair the steeple house.

Deane Parish.

Isabel Head Widow, For Tyth of the value of twelve shill. had taken from her one Cow, one Heifer, and one Stear worth at least five pounds, and for the like Tyth this year, she had taken from her two Mares worth six poundand above, these were taken by force of Justices Writs, though upon them no appearance was made, or Judgement gi∣ven.

Peter Head, For Tyth of the value of twelve shill. had a Cow taken from him, and also a Horse by colour of a Justices Writ, though no appearance or judgment was upon it; for these and many other great and cruel oppressions, Wilfrid

Lawson Sheriff of Cumberland ought to be called to ac∣compt.

Christopher Mauser, For Tyth of the value of twenty four shill. ten pence, had taken from him for the use of Patriciu•• Curwen, worth five pounds.

Caldbeck parish for Richard Hutton priest.

Thomas Mark, For Tyth Wooll of the value of sevente••n shillings, had a Horse taken from him worth fifty four shil∣lings.

The same also for other Tyth of small value, had two Ox••n and three Kine taken away by colour of a Justices VVrit, without appearance or judgement.

John Pattison, For Tyth of the value of sixteen shillings eleven pence, had taken from him Corn worth twenty five shill. six pence.

Richard Scott, For Tyth of the value of Four shill. Four pence, had two pair of Shoes taken from him worth seven shill. Four pence.

John Stricket, For Tyth of the value of sixteen shill. Four pence, had one Cow taken from him worth three pound six shill. eight pence.

Thomas Haskey, For Tyth of the value of three shill, five pence, had a pair of Cart-wheels taken from him worth seven shill.

John Haskey elder, For Tyth of the value of fifteen shill. two pence, had Corn & Sacks taken from him to Forty Four shill. ten pence.

William Stalker elder, For the Tyth of the value of fifteen shill. two pence, had Corn and Sacks taken from him worth twenty four shill.

Richard Wilson, For Tyth of the value of thirteen shil∣lings, had a brass Pot taken from him worth seven shil∣lings.

John Nicholson, For Tyth of the value of thirteen shill. Four pence, had a Cow taken from him worth Forty shil∣lings.

John Peacock, For Tyth of the value of twenty shill, or thereabouts, had Corn and Sacks taken from him worth thir∣ty shill. six pence.

All these Goods in Caldbeck Parish, were taken by War∣rant from Justice Barwis and Justice Fletcher, for the use of Priest Hutton.

Boulton Parish.

John Pattison, For Tyth of the value of twenty two shill. had one Cow taken from him for the use of Priest Forward, worth fifty sh ll.

John Wilkinson, for Tyth of the value of Four shill. eight pence, had one Cow taken from him for the use of the said Priest, worth fifty five shill.

Penreth Parish.

Taken from

• ...

  Thomas Midleton, one pewter dish worth three shill. six pence.

• ...

  Robert Dawson, three pewter dishes worth eight shill.

• ...

  Peter Tayler, two pewter dishes worth Four shill.

These were taken by an old Priest, who was formerly ejected on pretence of Easter Reckonings.

From Robert Dawson the Clerk also tooke one pewter dish worth sixteen pence.

Threapland.

Thomas Walker, For Tyth of the value of twenty three shillings, had his Barn locked up, and all his whole years Corn seized upon, except nine Bushels of Oates which he had got out. and also a Mare taken away under colour of a Justices Writ, though neither appearance nor judge∣ment.

Richard Robinson, For Tyth of the value of thirty shillings or thereabouts, had Goods and Cattel taken from him worth twenty Four pounds or thereabouts, by colour of a Justices Writ, without any due and legal proceeding thereup∣on.

Yorkeshire.

JAmes Gurnel, For the value of five shillings tan pence pre∣tended to be due to John Wargent a Priest▪ and Christo∣pher Wakefield an Impropriator for Tyths, had Goods taken to the value of Forty shillings, of which they returned back only two shillings six pence.

Robert Everat, For the value of thirty one shillings, pre∣tended to be due for Tyths to Robert Brown and Israel Town∣end, and Robert Otter, had his Horse taken away which was worth three pounds, which they got valued to fifty shillings and returned nothing again.

John Jayher, For the value of six shillings six pence pre∣tended to be due unto Thomas Healey Priest of Haxey for Tyths, had taken from him sixteen shillings Four pence.

Alexander Harland, For the value of three shillings pre∣tended to be due to Stother a Priest for Tyths, by order of two men in Commission to do Justice, was to have ten shillings, who granted their Warrant to distrain for the

same, and for that ten shillings they took away five Sheep, and rendred nothing again.

William Sharp, For the value of sixteen shillings pretended to be due for Tyths, and Easter Reckonings, as they called them, unto William Cooper a Minister so called, had a Mare worth three pound six shillings eight pence taken away and prised to two pound thirteen shillings Four pence, which being done, the said William Sharp said he wanted sixteen shillings of his due, although the said Cooper never answered him in the Law.

Matthewr Maire, For the value of Fourteen shillings pre∣tended to be due for Tyths unto Samuel Pibard Priest of Ow∣thorn, had Goods taken away to the value of five pounds which they rated ••o fifty shillings, of which sum the Bayliff said fifteen shillings remained, but was not received by the said Matth. w.

Thomas Agar, For the value of one shilling, one peny, pre∣tended to be due for Tyths unto William Catlin Priest of Crambe and Bart••n, had a Mare taken worth Four pound which they prised to three pound ten shillings, and took se∣venteen shillings for the said one shilling one peny.

William Thorpe, For the value of one shilling one peny pretended to be due for Tyths unto the above said William Catlin, had two Cows taken which they prised to two pound out of which they took fifteen shall. six pence.

Robert Bell, For the value of seven pence half peny, pre∣tended to be due for Tyths to the said Catlin, had one Cow taken, which they prised to twenty shillings, out of which they took sixteen shill.

George Matthew, For the value of two shillings, preten∣ded to be due for Tyths to the said Catlin, had a Horse taken which they prised to forty shillings, out of which they took nineteen shill. which was done by warrant from two men in Commission to do justice.

Edward Guy, For the value of two shillings nine pence, pretended to be due for Tyths, and Easter Reckonings, as they are called, unto Robert Lowther Priest of Bentham, for∣merly called a Malignant, had his Goods taken to the value

of thirteen shillings eight pence, and they said they must have more.

Richard Guy, For the value of five shillings Four pence, pretended to be due to Alexander Fetherston a Priest, and for eight pence pretended to be due to William Bells, Clerk to the abovesaid Robert Lowther, he had a Cow taken worth twenty seven shillings, and had nothing returned back.

George Bland, For the value of two pence claimed for Tyths by the abovesaid Robert Lowther, had his Goods ta∣ken to the value of sixteen shillings, and nothing was re∣turned back: And for eight pence claimed by the foresaid William Bells, he had also Goods taken valued to fifteen shill. and nothing returned back.

Richard Wickington, For the value of thirty Four shillings eight pence, pretended to be due unto John Norton a Priest for Tyths, had one Horse, one Mare, and two Oxen worth eleven pounds taken and by them prised to six pound.

John Wilson, For the value of three pound ten shillings, pretended to be due for Tyths to John Silburn an Impropria∣tor, who valued the same by his Son to Four pounds Four shillings, procured a VVarrant from two men in Commissi∣on to do justice, for five pound six shillings, for which they took Goods worth eight pounds fifteen shillings, which they valued to five pound ten shillings, and sold them for se∣ven pound seventeen shillings eight pence, and returned no∣thing again.

Walter Hall, For the value of thirty three shillings, pre∣tended to be due to the said John Silburn for Tyths, which his Son valued to be worth two pound thirteen shillings Four pence, procured a VVarrant from two men in Com∣mission to do justice, for the sum of two pounds nineteen shillings Four pence, for which they took Goods valued by two indifferent men to seven pounds, and nothing return∣ed.

Alexander Harland, For the value of three pounds ten shillings, pretended to be due to John Beamond Priest for Tyths, with two men more, was worth five pounds, where∣upon two men in Commission to do justice, gave order to

pay six pound sixteen shillings, for which they di••trained two Oxen, and one Horse worth eight pound ten shillings, which they valued to six pounds.

Mich. Simpson, a Farmer of forty two pound in the year, was sued by Charles Kaine a Priest, for Tythes which hap∣pened of the said Farm, which by his witnesses he proved to mount to the value of eighteen pound for one year, before Judge Parker at the Assizes at York, which said Judge gave Judgment for trible damages against him, which comes to fifty four pound.

William Pearson, was sued by Alexander Metcalf, called Parson of Setterrington, for Tyth which was worth about ten pounds, for which Judge Nudigate gave Judgment for thir∣ty three pound six shillings eight pence, of which nothing was abated.

Christopher Hutton, For the value of four pound twelve shillings six pence, pretended to be due for Tythes and char∣ges to John Pennil, Priest of Overhemsley, had two Oxen di∣strained by Warrant from two men in Commission to do Ju∣stice, which were worth seven pound, but by them valued at five pounds, of which they returned nothing back.

Jeff, Nicholson, For the value of thirty four shillings pre∣tended to be due for Tythes unto Lancelot Hasel, titled Mi∣nister of Bulmer, had three fat Kine driven away by colour of a Warrant from two men in commission to do justice, worth eight pounds, which they valued to five pound ten shillings, and so sold them and never returned one penny.

Richard Simpson, For one peny which William Catline Priest of Crambe, proved due to him for Tyth, distrained one Cow worth forty shillings, which they valued to twen∣ty shillings out of which they took fifteen shillings.

John Gothericke, for two pence which the said William Catline, proved due to him for Tyth, distrained one Cow, worth thirty shillings, which they valued at twenty shillings, out of which they took fifteen shillings.

John Pickering, having four Calven for which he offered the said Will. Catline what had been usually paid for such a number, which the said Catline refused to take, demanding

of him a Tyth Calfat four, which the said John Pickering re∣fusing to give him, the said Catline summoned him before two men in commission to do justice, who notwithstanding ordered the said Pickering to pay one shilling eleven pence which he proved due to him, and three shillings for char∣ges.

James Cookson, For the value of seven shillings nine pence, which James Williamson Minister of Crake proved before two men in Commission to do justice, due to him for Tythes, had a Cow taken away worth two pound, which they prised to twenty six shillings eight pence, and restored nothing a∣gain.

VVill. Peart, For the value of twenty six shillings eight pence, which the said VVilliamson proved before two men in Commission to do justice to be due to him for Tyth, had two Heifers worth three pound taken from him, and nothing re∣stored to him again.

Volentine Johnson, For the value of five shillings eight pence, which the said VVilliamson proved before two men in Commission to do justice to be due to him for Tyth, had a Cow driven away worth two pound, which they prised to thirty shillings, and nothing did they render to the own∣er.

Josias Cookson, For the value of twelve shillings nine pence, which the above named Iames VVilliamson proved be∣fore two men in Commission to do justice; to be due to him for Tyth, he had one Heifer taken away worth forty shillings, and nothing rendred again.

Tho. Scot. For the value of eleven shillings six pence pretended to be due unto Leonard Esh, an Impropriator called, had Goods taken from him worth six pounds, which they 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to five pound, and restored nothing to the owner again.

Thomas Johnson, For the value of thirty Four shillings pre∣tended to be due unto James 〈◊〉〈◊〉 aforesaid, called Mi∣nister of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 for Tyth had a Horse taken from him, for which he paid fifty two shillings before his 〈◊〉〈◊〉 was 〈◊〉〈◊〉

John Walker, For the value of eighteen shillings Four pence pretended to be due unto the above named Williamson, for Tyths, by order of two men in Commission to do justice was ordered to pay twenty five shillings, which accordingly was paid to the said James VVilliamson.

Thomas Thurham, For the value of sixteen shillings pre∣tended to be due unto the above named VVilliamson, was or∣dered by two men in place to do justice, to pay unto the said Williamson the sum of twenty three shillings, which was paid for him.

Thomas Aldam, By the means of Thomas Rooksby Priest of Warmsworth, and Thomas Vincent of the same, was cast in∣to prison at York the 15 day of the 3d Month called May, 1652, and there kept for about two years, and six months, in which time both the said parties sued him at the Law, for not setting forth his Tyths, he then being in prison. And at the Assizes at York, the said Thomas Rooksby procured a judgement from Richard Nudigate (called a Iudge) against him for sixteen pounds ten shillings for the Tyth of eleven Acres of Wheat, Rye, and Barley; ten Acres of Pease and Oates, and twelve Acres of Medow in one year, the ground being worth but about five shillings the Acre Rent in one year, and the said Thomas Vincent likewise procured another Iudgement from the said Richard Nudigate (called a Iudge) against the said Thomas Aldam at the same Assizes for the Tyth of Fourteen Acrees of Wheat, Rye, and Barley, and twelve Acres of Pease and Oates for one year, the sum of eighteen pounds six shillings, the Land being but worth five shillings an Acre yearly Rent; and the Bayliff (called Hen∣ry Worrel) levied the same upon the Goods of the said Tho∣mas Aldam, and took Four Oxen, seven Kine, one Stear, and one Heifer, which they prised and valued to thirty pounds ten shillings, and sold by the Bayliff that distrained them, which Goods were since valued by Neighbours to be worth thirty six pounds, and the said Bayliff after distrained one Mare, and one Horse of the said Thomas Aldams, which were prised to five pounds ten shillings, and for that sum sold to Thomas Broughton one of the Apprisers, who made

Merchandize with the spoyler for gain, and so the spoyle of Thomas Aldams Goods is about his house; the Mare and Horse cost Thomas Aldam about eleven pounds, which they valued and sold for five pounds ten pence.

Richard Tomliason, For the value of eighteen pence or thereabouts for Tyth Hay, had one Mare taken from him worth five pounds.

Sedbergh, and thereabouts.

Thomas Blaikling, For Tythes of the value of twenty shillings three pence, had a Horse taken from him worth three pound ten shill.

Edward Atkinson, For Tythes of the value of nine shilling three pence, had a Mare taken from him worth about four pound.

Richard Speight, For Tythes of the value of five shillings eleven pence, had a Cow taken from him worth three pound.

Anthony VVillan, For Tythes of the value of fifteen shil∣lings, had a Horse taken away worth above three pound.

Thomas VVillan, For Tythes of the value of ten shillings three pence, had a Mare taken from him worth four pound.

George Mason, For Tythes of the value of five shillings, had a Horse taken from him worth four mark.

Thomas Banks, for Tythes of the value of nineteen shill. six pence, had a Horse taken from him worth above four pound.

All the obove named parriculars, were taken for the use of Richard Atkinson, Iames Burton, and Iames Tompson, within the called Parish of Sedbergh.

Craike Parish,

Iosias Cookson, For Tythes of the value of seven pence half peny, had judgment given against him by two Justices to pay ten shillings Costs, and the value of the said Tythes.

Iames Cookson, For Tythes of the value of ten pence, had judgement given against him by two Justices to pay ten shill. Costs, and the value of the Tythes.

Iohn VValker, For Tythes of the value of twelve pence, had the like judgement given against him to pay ten shillings Costs, beside the value of the Tythes.

Thomas Iohnson, For Tythes of the value of four shillings eight pence haf peny, had the like judgement given against him to pay ten shillings Costs, besides the value of the Tythes.

These were decreed to be payd to Iames Williams••n, Priest of Craike; but what Goods he hath distrained for the same, was not known when this was given in.

Westmerland.

Edmond W••i••wel, For the value of six pence claimed by Priest Greenwood of Hutton Chappel, to be due to him for one year and a half, had a Horse taken from him, worth two pound eighteen shillings four pence.

Iohn Sutton, For Tyth of the value of twenty one shill▪ claimed by Iohn Winter Priest of Clifton, so valued by the Priests Servant, was ordered by two Justices, to have three pound seven shill. 6d. levyed of his goods by Distress, and six shill. eight pence for Costs, and had two Mares taken a∣way worth six pound thirteen shill four pence.

John Wilkinson, For Tyth of the value of thirty shillings, given in by oath of one witness; and John Wilkinson his son, For Tyth of the value of thirty shill. without other oath than

the Priests owa, had Kine taken away from John the son worth twenty pound, for the use of Iohn Vaux, Priest of Great Musgrave.

John Wilkinson, For Tyth of the value of thirty shillings, so est••mated by the Justices without other proof, was order∣ed to have two pound fire shill. eight pence levyed of his Goods, for the use of the foresaid Priest Vaux, and a Cow was taken away for it worth five pound, though a son of the said Iohns tendered the money.

Iohn Fallowfield, For Tyth of the value of fifteen shillings, as the Priests own witnesses estimated, had taken from him, for the use of Peirce Burton, Priest of Morland, by Warrant from the Justices, one of them the Priests brother, one Mare and a Foal worth five pound, and the priest sent one to of∣fer back eleven shill. eight pence, as the fellow that came said.

Henry Lycock, For Tyth of the value of two shillings, as was claimed, had taken away for the use of the said Priest Burton, one Caldron worth eighteen shill.

Iohn Tompson, For Tyth of the value of sixteen shillings, so estimated by the servants of him that demanded it, had taken from him a Horse worth fifty shillings, for the use of Christopher Lister, and the man that took the Horse, sent word to Iohn Tompson, if he would not come and lose the Horse, he might come and fetch more.

William Hebson, For Tyth to the value of three pound nine shillings four pence, had taken Goods to the value of seven pound, for the use of Nicholas Mawson.

More taken from him for repairing the Steeple-house, two shillings, his rate by sesse being six pence.

William Halme, For Tyth to the value of twenty three shil. had Goods taken to the value of forty four shill.

More taken for six pence sesse, for repair of the Steeple-house, to the value of two shillings four pence.

Thomas Alexander, For Tyth to the value of twenty pence, had Goods taken to the value of five shillings.

More, for three pence Seffe for repair of the Steeple-house,

to the value of two shillings six pence.

Iohn Smith, For Tyth to the value of four shill. six pence, had Goods taken to the value of eight shill.

Tho. Wharton, For six pence Sesse for repair of the Steeple-house, had taken to the value of two shill.

Henry Lycock, For Tyth to the value of twenty six shill. had Goods taken to the value of three pound.

More, for Tyth to the value of two shillings, had a Kettle taken to the value of twenty shill.

Richard Smith, For Tyth to the value of five shillings six pence, had Goods taken to the value of seventeen shill.

Iohn Wilkinson, For nine shillings three pence, had Goods taken to the value of twenty two shill.

Alice VVilson, For eight shillings, had Goods taken to the value of sixteen shill.

Edmond VVhitewel, For four shill. six pence, had Goods taken to the value of nine shill.

Annas Tarne, For ten shillings, had Goods taken to the va∣lue of twenty four shill.

Musgrave Parish.

Iohn VVilliamson, For Tyth estimated at thirteen shillings, had one Cow taken away worth five pound, for the use of the Priests farmer.

Iohn VVilliamsons son, For Tyth of the value of thirty shill. proved by one witness to be due from his Father, and other thirty shillings by the Paiests own oath, had four Cows ta∣ken away worth twenty pound, and nothing offered to be returned, and the Cows driven away where the owner could never see them again. These were taken for the use of the said Priest Musgrave.

Laneasbire.

Robert VVidder, Tho. Leaper, Robert Stons; These three

being Inhabitauts of the County of Lancaster, were sued and run to an Outlary in VVestmerland, having no know∣ledge of it till upon the Outlary they were apprehended, and carried to Lancaster Goale, where they have remained a∣bove sixteen months; The Suit was brought in the name of Ralph Ashton stiled Baronet, and Thomas VVitherington stiled Knight, for refusing to pay Tythes to Iames Schoolcrof Priest of Caton.

Richard Mires, Because for conscience sake he could not pay Tythes to Tho. Shaw Priest of Aldingham, was impriso∣ned in the Goale of Lancaster, and there remained many months.

Richard Ashburner, For Tythes of the value of twenty three shillings four pence, as the Priest pretended, had a Horse taken away worth four pound; and for Tythes of the value of twenty shillings, as he pretended, had taken away a Cow worth fifty eight shillings four pence, for the use of Tho. Shaw Priest of Aldingham: And ten dayes afterwards, the said Priest brought a Writ against the said Ashburner, and laid him in the Goale at Lancaster, where he has remained many months.

John Lawson, and several others, were sued by the Priest of Lancaster, and had their Goods taken away and trible da∣mages given to the Priest.

William Greenbanck, For Tyth to the value of six pound, or thereabouts, which by one James Baleman and James Whitehead, was sworne to above eleven pound, had Goods taken from him for the use of Thomas Whitehead, called Mi∣nister or Parson of Halton in Lancashire, to the value of twen∣ty two pound and upward.

Janet Dickenson, a poor woman who hath nothing to live upon but her hand labour, who have farmed about one Rood of ground, the Tyth whereof was valued to eight pence, for which the said Tho. Whitehead sued her in the Exchequer at Westminster, to answer which Suit she travelled near two hun∣dred miles; in which Court he declared against her for Tyth of twenty seven Acres of Corn and meadow.

Alice Weodhead of Clown in Darby shire, for Tyth to the value of twenty one shillings, had Goods taken to the value of five pound.

Durham.

Iohn Richmond, had Cattle worth forty pound or therea∣bouts, taken from him by colour of a Warrant from Commis∣sioners sitting at Newcastle, as was pretended but never shewed to him, for the use of one VVildbore, who was long since cast out of the Vicarage at Heighington for scandal and insufficiency, by Commissioners sitting at Newcastle, which Cattle were driven to Durham, and there sold for twenty pound, and not one peny offered back, when the sum they demanded was but a small part of it; and though the said Iohn Richmond (knowing the said Commissioners had no po∣wer to give any judgement for Tythes to the said priest) went to the Sheriff George Lilburn for a replevit, the said Lil∣burn refused to grant it; and thus they joyn hand in hand to make their oppressions remediless, yea even for those them∣selves call scandalous.

VVilliam Richmond, and Thomas Richmond, by the same illegal Warrant, had Cattle of a great value driven away for the use of the said ejected Priest, though they were never ser∣ved with the Warrant.

Yorkeshire.

Thomas Aldam, prosecuted in the Common pleas for Tythes by Thomas Rooksbie, a called Minister of VVarmsworth, who lately had the spoyl of his Goods.

Iames Tennant, Nichol. Row, Iohn Metcalfe, prosecuted in the Chancery for Tythes.

Henry Bayley, Anthony Wilson, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Richard Robinson, Alexander Hebblethwaite, Iames Corney,

now prisoners in the Fleet, because for conscience sake they could not swear about Tyths, Ionas Smith, John Somerson, now prisoners concerning Tythes.

Thomas Aldam, William Ratliffe, Anthony Wilberfosse, William Sikes, Thomas Scot, William Simpson, Michael Simp∣son, Gervase Benson, Edward Atkinson, have been prisoners concerning Tythes.

Lancashire.

William Greenbanck, Ianet Dickenson, Thomas Comin, Thomas Atkinson, Iames Taylor, Richard Rooper, Richard Brit∣ton, Alexander Rigg, Iohn Burrow, Lawrence Newton, George Garnet, william Pull, Richard Weaver, Iohn Wayman, Wil∣liam Wayman. Edward Comin, Gregory Cockerham, sued in the Exchequer for Tythes.

Robert Widder, Thomas Leaper, Robert Stout, Richard Ashburner, Robert Walker, Richard Mires, Thomas Hill, have been imprisoned concerning Tythes.

Cumberland.

Iohn Dixon, Iohn Fearon, Iohn Gill, Matthew Robinson, Iames Wilson, William Richardson, sued in the upper Bench for Tythes.

George Rothery, Richard Williamson, have been prisoners concerning Tythes.

Westmerland.

William Cartnel, Richard Sill, sued in the Exchequer for Tythes.

Iohn Foothergit, William Hebson, Thomas Atkinson, Ed∣ward Robinson, Henry Ward, Thomae Robertson, Thomas Wright, have been prisoners concerning Tythes.

Durham.

Martin Richmond, John Richmond, John Greenwel, Will▪ Foster, sued in the Exchequer for Tythes.

John Richmond, Nichollas Pickering, have been prisoners concerning Tythes.

Nottinghamshire.

William Cleater, now in prison in the Fleet, because for conscience sake he cannot swear about Tyth.

Robert Mawlam, sued in the Exchequer for Tythes.

Glocestershire.

Walter Clement, Reynold Williams, William Watkins, Wal∣ter Summers, Thomas Hill, William Wooley, Thomas Dood∣ing, Elizabeth Dorney Widow, Mawrice Smith, John Taylor, William Coxe, sued in the Exchequer for Tythes.

Buckinghamshire.

Richark Marks, Walter Mabley, Richard Hunt, Thomas Harvey, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Suffolk.

George Sherwin, William Wawn, John Smith, John Simp∣son, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Bedfordshire.

James Taylor, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth,

Hertfordshire.

John Blindell, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Summersetshire.

Thomas Darley, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Wiltshire.

David Hale, John Ioy, and Charles Barret, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Oxfordshire.

Richard Church, imprisoned for Tyth.

Middlesex.

Richard Davies, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Robert Dring, hath been imprisoned for Tyth.

Iohn Askew, is sued in Chancery for Tyth.

Kent.

Samuel Fisher, Abiezar Boykin, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Sussex.

Richard Prat, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Leicestershire.

Edward Moggleson the elder, Edward Moggleson the younger, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

Norsolk.

Robert Iacob, sued in the Exchequer for Tyth.

These with divers others, (whose names may hereafter be published, with the names of those by whom they are unjustly vexed, if they go on in their persecution of the Innocent;) are sufferers for Tyth as is aforesaid.

Clerks Wages and Repair of Steeple-houses.

Ri••hard Peacock, had taken from him one wooden Ves∣sel worth eighteen pence, because he could not pay twelve pence, which Priest Gilpins Clerk demanded for Wages, though he hired him not.

Thomas Barker, had taken from him one Pan worth one shilling, because he could not pay six pence, which the said Priests Clerk demanded for his Wages.

Iohn Mark, had taken from him one Pan worth twelve pence, because he could not pay six pence, which the said Clerk demanded, &c.

Iohn Dixon, had taken from him five Power Dishes and

one brass Pot worth sixteen shillings, or more, because he could not for conscience sake pay ten shillings, which was de∣manded of him for Repairs of a Steeple-house.

Iames Wilson, had taken from him three pewter Platters worth seven shillings.

Mungo Wilson, had taken from him one Platter, worth five shillings.

Richard Whiney, had taken from him two Platters worth three shill.

Anthouy Scrugham, had taken from him one Pot worth two shillings three pence; because for conscience sake they could not pay money towards repair of the Steeple-house at Brigham.

William Iackson, had taken from him six pewter Platters, and one pewter Cup worth nine shillings, because he could not pay money towards repair of a Steeplehouse at Lonswa∣ter.

Thomas Flatcher, had taken from him one pewter platter worth twelve pence, because he could not pay four pence to the Clerk of Lowswater Steeple-house.

Iohn Tyson, had taken from him one Pewter Platter worth nine pence, because he could not pay four pence, which the said Clerk demanded.

William Fletcher, For the like, had one pewter Cup ta∣ken away from him.

Ioha Pattisen, had taken from him by the Clerk of Boul∣ton, one Pan worth five shillings six pence.

Concerning Swearing.

Richard Peacock, because for conscience sake he could not swear, was fined at the County Court by the Sheriffs Of∣ficers twenty shillings, for which the Bayliffe took from him one Mare worth thirty shillings, though he appeared at the Court, and was ready to do any service he could.

Michael Nicholson, because he could not swear, was fi∣ned, at the Earle of Northumberlands Court, (so called)

ten shillings, for which the Bay list took away one Sack, two Sheets, two Pans, and two pewter Dishes worth seventeen shill.

William Pearson, because he could not swear being fined ten shillings at the County Court, had taken from him by the Bayliffs one Cow worth about forty shill.

The same William Pearson, because he could not swear, was fined at the Earle of Northumberlands Court, (so called) and the Bayliffs took from him one Mare and Foal worth three pound.

Matthew Kirkbride, because he could not swear, was fined at the Sheriffs County Court, for which the Bayliffs took away the very bedding wherein himself and Wife lay, she being big with child and near to be delivered, and some Sacks, Yarn, and Corn, which they had provided for her maintenance, worth about thirty seven shillings, and left them not wherewith to cover themselves in the midst of win∣ter, and Sir Wilfrid Lawson; (so called) the Sheriff, being acquainted with it, and asked whether he would own such things to be done, and to his use, he answered yes, and that he should not expect to be remedied at his hands; Oh hard hearted and inhumane cruely!

Iohn Peacock, because he could not swear, was fined at the County Court, the Sheriff being present, twenty shill. for which the Bayliffs took away one Mare worth thirty shil∣lings.

Iohn Stenton, because he could not swear, was fined ten shillings, at the called Earle of Northumberlands Court, at Mashdale, by Iames Pearson Steward, for which the Bay∣liff took away two tanned Hides, and half a Bend, worth to be sold twenty six shill.

Hugh Tickel, because he could not swear, was fined ten shillings at Ullock Court, for which one Kettle was taken from him worth fourteen shill.

Thomas Piele, because he could not swear, was fined at Cockermouth Court six shillings right pence, for which a brass Pot, one Pan, and a wooden vessel worth ten shillings, were taken from him.

Christopher Wandsor, because he could not swear, was fi∣ned at Wurkington Court, twenty shillings, for the use of Patri••ius Carwen called Baronet, for which his Bayliffs took away one Horse worth three pound ten shill.

William Stamper, because he could not swear at the She∣riffs county Court, was fined twenty shillings, for which one Mare was taken away for the use of the said Sheriff, worth three pound ten shillings.

Leonard Scott, because he could not swear, was fined at the Sheriffs Court, and after he was dead, the Bayliffs took a∣way Pewter, Brasse, and Iron for it, though all his Goods fell much short of paying his debts, which his eldest son had undertaken to discharge.

The aforesaid Wilfrid Lawson high Sheriff, charged his Bayliffs to return the Names of those people called Quakers, for Jurers who were to answer at his Court at I••ell, which they did, and there they fined some ten shillings, some twen∣ty shillings, some forty shillings, and some other greater sums, as in particular, Mungo Scott three pound thirteen shillings four pence; And some of the Landlords threaten them with the forfeiture of their Lands, which they hold of them by Copy or customary Tennant right, because they say they deny to do their suit and service; and all this is because for conscience sake they cannot swear, and trangresse the plain Command of Christ, though any service for the good of the Country they are willing to perform, and will be faith∣ful without an oath; and for the keeping of their consciences clear, though in the outward they be for the most part poor, yet with joy they can suffer the spoyling of their Goods, and give their backs to the Smiter.

John Fell, Because he could not swear, was fined at Io. Dal∣stons Court at Vidale, and had an Ewe and Lamb taken away for it worth five shillings,

Tho. Fell, Because he could not swear, was fined at the said Court, & had an Ewe and Lamb taken away for it worth 6s. 8d.

Io. Caipe, Because he could not swear, was fined at the said Court, and had a sheep taken worth four shillings

Tho. Fletcher, Because he could not swear, was fined at Wil∣frid

Lawsons Mannor Court (who is now the high Sheriffe) forty shillings, and for it had thirty one shillings four pence taken away.

The same the next Court after was fined for not swearing six shillings eight pence.

He also the next Court following was fined twenty shillings for not swearing: for these two later fines the said Lawson caused his Bailiffe to take away a great Kettle▪ and a Web of white Kerfie worth thirty six shillings.

Iohn Dixon, Because he could not swear, was fined at the said Lawsons Court, and another time for not appearing when he was in prison for the testimony of a good conscience, was also fined, and for which he had taken away one brass pot, and two pewter dishes worth sixteen shillings.

Durham.

Geo. Burdon of Easington, because he could not swear, was fined by the Sheriff, and had thirteen shillings taken from him. And divers others for the same thing were fined in like maner.

Yorkeshire.

Richard Robinson, Alexander Hebblethwait, Iames Corney, Because they could not for conscience sake swear and give in their answers to the Bill of Complaint of Richard Atkinson of Garsdale, Iames Burton of Dent, and Iames Tompson being for tythes, were committed prisoners to the Fleet by Robert Nicholas, and others the called Barons of the Exchequer, where they yet remain in prison.

Nottinghamshire.

William Cleater is now prisoner in the Fleet upon the same account▪ at the suit of one Dove Williamson, a called Minister; which said Williamson had one of his leggs shot with a Ca∣non bullet, he being in one of the late Kings Garrisons.

G. B. his Queries concerning Tythes, &c.

1. When there was no King in Israel every one did that which was right in his own eyes, Iudg. 17 6. Was it so yea or nay?

2. When there was a King in England, did he well in suf∣fering divers of his subjects to be imprisoned without any cause shewed: And when for their deliverance they▪ were brought before his Justices, there to undergoe and receive ac∣cording to the Laws of the Land, no breach of any Law be∣ing proved against them, and yet they returned back to severall prisons without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer according to the Law: And were they the Kings friends that advised so to doe, yea or nay?

3. Whether did the Parliament well to lay before him in the third year of his reign in the Petition of Right, that, and other things imposed upon his subjects, contrary to the lawes and their just liberties, as a grievance, and to desire from him, That all his Officers and Ministers should serve him according to his laws & statutes of his Realm as they tendered his honour, and the prosperity of his Kingdome: And did the King well when he said, Let right be done as is desired, yea or nay?

4. Whether the Statutes of England be a part of the Law of England? And whether is the Law of England a Rule in it self both for Magistrates and people to walke by, yea or nay?

5. Whether the Law of England be the higher Power, or the Judges and Lawyers opinions, which may be gained for money? And whether are the Justices the Masters of the law or the Ministers of the law?

6. Whether he is subject to the higher power who lives and walks according to what the Law requires; or he that follows the opinions and inventions of men, when in plain∣nesse the law requireth one thing, and their opinions and in∣ventions are another thing?

7. Whether is he a faithfull Minister of the Law, and fit to judge of mens lives, libertie, and estates, who writes one thing, and mean and does another, who takes an oath to judge according to the law, and yet quite contrary to the law com∣mands mens persons to be imprisoned, and their goods to be taken from them?

8. Whether do the Justices act according to the••r Com∣missions or Patents, who passe judgement against the peoples liberties and estates where there is no law of the Nation to warrant such their judgments: but on the contrary the law of the Nation saith in express words, it shal not be lawful for any so to do?

9. Whether is he the Minister of God yea or nay, that feigneth or suggesteth a lie, or owneth or joyneth with such as he knoweth doth feign & suggest lies, to the end they may have a pretence or colour to draw people before their judgment seats (which they call Courts of Equity) which if the lies which is the foundation of many Bills of Complaint, were taken away, they then had no colour of action in such Courts; neither is there any law of this Nation to warrant such actions, as is confessed in severall of their Bills of Complaints?

10. From whence is that Law, and for what end was it given, that is not equall? And is that equal which is not iusts, ors equitys which is not lawfull?

11. Whether is the Proviso in a statute, a part of the sta∣tute,

yea or nay? If nay, why was it inserted? If yea, then they that act contrary to it, are convinced of it as trans∣gressors.

12. Whether were not the Courts Temporall and the Courts Spirituall two severall Jurisdictions, and so accounted and adjudged by the late Kings and Parliaments of England? And whether had not the late Kings and Parliaments power to make lawes, and to declare what was law yea or nay? And was it not declared in expresse words by the King and Par∣liament in the 24 Hen. 8. Chap 12. That rights of Tythes, Oblations and Obventions, the knowledge whereof by the goodnesse of Princes of this Realm, and by the Lawes and Cu∣stomes of the same, appertaineth to the Spirituall Jurisdiction of the Realm.

13. Whether is the Statute of the 2, 3, Edw. 6. Chap. 13. of force yea or nay? If yea, is it not therein provided and in∣acted, That if any person do substract or withdraw any man∣ner of Tythes, Obventions, Profits, Commodities, or other duties, or any part of them, contrary to the true meaning of the said Act, or of any other Act heretofore made, that then the party so substracting or withdrawing the same, may or sha••l de convented & sued in the Kings Ecclesiasticall Court, by the party from whom the same shal be substracted or with∣drawn, to the intent the Kings Judge Ecclesiasticall shall and may then and there to hear and determine the same according to the Kings Ecclesiastical lawes, and that it shall not be law∣ful unto the Parson, Vicar, Proprietory, Owner, or other their Farmers or Deputie, cōtrary to this act; to convent or sue such with-holder of Tythes, Obventions, or other duties aforesaid before any other Judge than Ecclesi••sticall, yea or nay? If nay, then why are the people punished as transgressors of that law which is repealed? And if yea, then why are the People convented and sued for with holding their Tythes, &c before the temporall Judges, and in the temporall Courts, contrary to the said Act?

14. Whether doth not he or they who give their opinions and make it their practice to convent and sue men in the tem∣porall Courts of this Nation the people thereof for substract∣ing

and with-drawing their Tythes▪ Oblations and Obventi∣ons, &c. And say it is lawfull for them so to do, give the law the lye. And are these Ministers of the law who gives the law the ly, who say it shall be lawful when the law saith it shal not be lawful? Are not such unreasonable men? & do not such go about to make the law of none effect through their Tradi∣tions, and set up for self-ends their own opinions and inventi∣ons in stead of the lay, yea or nay?

15. Whether is it not provided in the statute of 32 Hen. 8•• cap. 7. in these words, viz. Provided alwayes that the last Act shall not extend nor be expounded to give any remedy, cause of action, or suit in the Courts temporall against any person or persons which shall refuse or deny to set out his or their Tythes, or shall detain, with-hold, or refuse to pay his tythes or offerings, or any parcell thereof, but that in such cases the person or party being Ecclesiasticall or Lay person, having cause to demand or have the said tythes or offerings, & thereby wronged or grieved, shall take or have their remedy for their said tythes o•• offerings; in every such case in the Spirituall Courts according to the Ordinance of the first part of this Act, and not otherwise. And doe not such whether Ecclesiasticall or Lay persons otherwise, who sue people for tythes and offerings in temporall Courts for the same, An∣swer yea or nay?

16. Whether there is any transgression where there is no law? And whether there is or ought to be any trebble dam∣mage adjudged, where and when no tythes are due? And if there be no law of the Nation to warrant the temporall Jud∣ges to try the right of tythes, the law saying that the tryall therof appertaineth to the spiritual Jurisdiction by the laws & customs of the Realm: Then how can it be lawful for the tem∣porall Judges to give judgement in their temp••rall Courts for treble damages, or any Jury to find treble damage for not dividing, setting forth or not paying their prediall tythes, o•• or for taking or carrying away the same before the tenth part of the same be divided or set forth, when there is no law of the Nation to authorize them to heare or determine of the right of tythes who are temporall Judges in their temporall Courts.

17. Whether do such Justices and Juries who act contra∣ry to the aforesaid statute, or any other, tender the honor and prosperity of the Nation, or serve the chief Magistrate thereof according to the lawes and statutes thereof? And if not, is not their crime as great as their predecessors, who suffered for such things? And are not they inexcusable before God and Man, who have condemned others for so doing, and now do the same things? Answer yea or nay.

Read and understand, Weigh and give advice ye learned Coun∣cell of the Nation, as you are called, for according to your deserts will your reward be, whosoever of you these Que∣ries under your hands in writing shall answer according to truth, and return to any of the people called Quakers.

WAs there ever such merchandize made of any people since the world began as these fals teachers have done in our age before mentioned? Was there ever such oppressi∣on and such heavy burdens laid upon any people since the world began as these false Priests and teachers have done in our age that the Reader may find before mentioned? Have they not out stript all the burdens, all the grievous bur∣dens of the Pharisees which they themselves will not touch with one of their fingers? Was there ever such devouring, ra∣vening by all the false teachers since the world began as these do in our age, which take a way the peoples goods, cattel, Hor∣ses, Sheep, Oxen, Platters, Kettles, Plow-geare, and what they can lay their hands on for a Prophet, spoyling peoples goods, and making havock of them; who can but say the measure of iniquity reaches to the full? Was ever people made a prey upon and devoured by the false teachers in all the ages past since the world began, as they are by the false teachers in this our age, which makes a prey upon the people, devours them, and treads upon them, that are fed, and eats the fat, cloaths with the wool? Was ever people so bitten w^th, the teeth, and prepared war against since the world began, as they are in this our age; who cannot put into the mouthes of the fals tea∣chers, which brings the people all on heaps, who would pluck

the skin off their flesh, and bite them with their teeth; whiles they put into their mouthes they cryed peace unto them, but they are fallen in the night, whose doth appear op∣pression, violence, and spoyling the goods of people, hath not the hearts of the simple been long deceived by such, and doth not the folly of these now appear unto all men? and are not ma∣nifest that have the love of money that teaches for filthy lucre, who pierce themselves through with many hurtfull lusts, who have the love of money which is the root of all evill; which things the man of God must flye: Marrk how many prisons have been filled in this Nation by them for the love of money, yea how many have been prisoned to death, witnesse Lanca∣ster, Colchester, York and Exceter, such as are prisoned to death which the Priests are raging against, was ever Balaam so mad who loved the wages of unrighteousness, who was in the error, as are the teachers in this age, who are so greedy of gifts and rewards; nay, if men will not give it them, they wil take it by violence, & summon them up into Courts, upper Bench, Exchequer, Chancery Common Pleas, to answer before the Barons of the Nation, and there cause poore men to come up; these Priests some for 4 or 5 shillings, some for less, two hun∣dred miles poor labouring men, and thus they use them without any pity or compassion, and if they wil not pay them, takes their Pots, or Kettles, or Platters, Priest sends to take them away, or Plow-gear. Was ever the like heard in all ages since the world began? Are not these they that makes the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ chargeable? And are not these things a shame to all Christians, that their teachers should make such fruits manifest, nay their Colleges at Cam∣bridge, where they make their Ministers, have caused some to be cast in prison for not paying them their tythes. Here the mother and her sons both make havock; one was prisoned at York till he died for not paying tythes; prisoned another to death by Priest Shaw, for not paying him tythes. Now if these things doe not shame all Christian Magistrates and Rulers, what will, that have not a feeling in them with these sufferers? And if this be not a dishonor to truth and the Gospel, what is? and Christ who sends forth his teachers freely as they re∣ceive

so to give. Now if you cannot see that you and such teachers are contrary to Christ and his Apostles, the God of the world hath blinded your eyes, and you are such as Je∣remy speaks of in the horrible and filthy thing, the Priests bear rule by their means, and the people love to have it so: but what will you do in the end thereof? Never did so much naked∣ness appear in any age you read of, as doth in this age among them, which are not wotthy to have the name of teachers of truth, which generations to come will be ash••med of since the days of the Apostles in this night of apostasie and darkness: Hath the false teachers got up tythes, yea and of the people will have treble damage if they will not pay them, by whose means many come to lose almost their whole estates, having it taken from them for the priests. The Apostle shewed that tythes were taken away, and the command disan••lled by which they were payed, and the hand-writing of Ordinances blotted out.

George Fox.

FINIS.