Page 96
The Two and Twentieth accused Point.
That no Good Works are Meritorious.
Ans. The word Merit is ambiguous, and so abused by Papists, that indeed the Protestants are shyer of it than the Fathers were, lest the use of it should cherish the abuse.
1. There is Merit of man, and of God. 2. And this in Commutative Justice (con∣ceited,) or only in Governing distributive Justice. 3. And this is either according to the Law of Innocency or Moses, or ac∣cording to the Law of Christ.
Now Protestants hold, 1. As to the Name, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, worthy and worthiness, are Scripture words, and may be used; and Merit is but of the same sig∣nification, and we condemn not the Anci∣ents that so used it: But the worst Sence must not be cherished.
2. Do they hold, 1. That no Creature can merit of God in Commutative Justice, that giveth quid pro quo to his Benefit: God receiveth not from Man or Angels; unless he will call Acceptance and Com∣placence Receiving.
3. None but Christ merited of strict Governing Justice, according to the Law