Prophet in Infancy, and that so may Infants be Disciples.
Mr. T. 6. If in the distribution of the mem∣bers of the Church then, Infants are not compre∣hended, then Infants were not visible Church-members — But, &c.
Answ. 1. Here he instanceth in 1. The sex, Men and Women, 2. Jews and Gentiles, 3. Cir∣cumcision and uncircumcision, mentioned, but not Infants. But if Infants be of neither sex, male nor female, nor of Jews or Gentiles, nor circum∣cision nor uncircumcision, I plead not for them.
2. If those Texts cited by you mention not In∣fants, others do, as I have elsewhere proved: Our children are called Holy, and a blessed seed, and received by Christ, and of such is the King∣dom of God, &c. And you confess it of Christ himself in his Infancie, and yet now forget it, or contradict your self.
Mr. T. 2. I argue from the common received definitions of the visible Church, Acts 19. of the Church of England: A congregation of faithful men — &c.
Answ. And so Kingdoms and all Societies that Infants are members of, are accordingly defined, as is aforesaid. You cannot deny it. And was not the Church before Christs incarnation a socie∣ty of faithful men, when yet you confess that Infants were visible parts of is?
Mr. T. 3. I argue, They are no visible members of the Christian Church, to whom no note where∣by a visible Christian Church or Church-member∣ship is discernable, doth agree: But, &c. ergo—