More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.

About this Item

Title
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson ...,
1675.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Infant baptism -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A26959.0001.001
Cite this Item
"More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A26959.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

SECT. XIII, XIV, XV, XVI.

R. B. MOreover, 1. Infants were Church-members in Abrahams family before Circumcision, and after when it was no Common-wealth. So they were in Isaacs, Jacobs, &c.

2. The banished, captivated, scattered Jews, that ceased to be members of their Common-wealth, yet ceased not to be of their Church.

3. The people of the Land, that became Jews in Hesters time, joyned not themselves to their Common-wealth: Nor the Sichemites.

4. Many Proselytes never joyned themselves to their Common-wealth.

Mr. T. affirmeth them all to have been Com∣mon-wealths.

Answer. The word being ambiguous may in a large sense be extended to a family, and to a

Page 30

scattered people that have no Soveraign; but is not so usually taken.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.