CHAP. XIII. Point X. Of denying Baptism to them that refuse the Cross. (Book 13)
BUT the practice of Crossing is disputable, and I lay not so sharp a censure on them that differ from us in it: But what excuse can be made by a man of Christian charity, and consideration for denying Baptism to all that re∣fuse this crossing, I confess I cannot imagine, nor could ever hear.
Their excuse is, that Crossing being lawful, the Refusers are disorderly Schismaticks, and they and their Children (as theirs) un∣capable of Baptism. They say it is not they, but you that are the Re∣fusers. They offer to baptize you or your Child, and you refuse it.
1. They know that it is not Baptism but Crossing that is re∣fused: And if they will not administer one without the other, they are the refusers. If one refuse the Papists Exorcism, Salt, Spittle, &c. and they will not baptize without it, do they not deny to Baptize, unless one will receive all these? If God will justifie them for rejecting all that think it a sin to receive their Crossing, then it is not them to whom it is to be imputed. But can that be true?
1. Christ that instituted Baptism, ordained the conditions of it, and the qualifications of such as shall be baptized, Mat. 28. and Mark 16. 16. He that believed was to be Baptized. Act. 28. If thou believe with all thy heart thou mayest: No, saith the Canon you shall not, though you repent and believe, un∣less also you will take the covenanting Badge of the Cross. Is not this to alter the terms of Christ's Covenant and Sacrament,