The English nonconformity as under King Charles II and King James II truly stated and argued by Richard Baxter ; who earnestly beseecheth rulers and clergy not to divide and destroy the land and cast their own souls on the dreadful guilt and punishment of national perjury ...

About this Item

Title
The English nonconformity as under King Charles II and King James II truly stated and argued by Richard Baxter ; who earnestly beseecheth rulers and clergy not to divide and destroy the land and cast their own souls on the dreadful guilt and punishment of national perjury ...
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for Tho. Parkhurst ...,
1689.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of England -- Controversial literature.
Dissenters, Religious -- England.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A26924.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The English nonconformity as under King Charles II and King James II truly stated and argued by Richard Baxter ; who earnestly beseecheth rulers and clergy not to divide and destroy the land and cast their own souls on the dreadful guilt and punishment of national perjury ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A26924.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. XIII. Point X. Of denying Baptism to them that refuse the Cross. (Book 13)

M.

BUT the practice of Crossing is disputable, and I lay not so sharp a censure on them that differ from us in it: But what excuse can be made by a man of Christian charity, and consideration for denying Baptism to all that re∣fuse this crossing, I confess I cannot imagine, nor could ever hear.

L.

Their excuse is, that Crossing being lawful, the Refusers are disorderly Schismaticks, and they and their Children (as theirs) un∣capable of Baptism. They say it is not they, but you that are the Re∣fusers. They offer to baptize you or your Child, and you refuse it.

M.

1. They know that it is not Baptism but Crossing that is re∣fused: And if they will not administer one without the other, they are the refusers. If one refuse the Papists Exorcism, Salt, Spittle, &c. and they will not baptize without it, do they not deny to Baptize, unless one will receive all these? If God will justifie them for rejecting all that think it a sin to receive their Crossing, then it is not them to whom it is to be imputed. But can that be true?

1. Christ that instituted Baptism, ordained the conditions of it, and the qualifications of such as shall be baptized, Mat. 28. and Mark 16. 16. He that believed was to be Baptized. Act. 28. If thou believe with all thy heart thou mayest: No, saith the Canon you shall not, though you repent and believe, un∣less also you will take the covenanting Badge of the Cross. Is not this to alter the terms of Christ's Covenant and Sacrament,

Page 76

and directly to contradict his very fundamental Law of Christi∣anity? Baptize all that are made disciples, saith Christ, and all that repent and believe: No saith our Convocation, baptize none of them that will not take the transient Image of a Cross, for their farther obligation.

2. Do you that think it is necessary to Christianity and Salva∣tion know that this Federal Crossing is lawful? if you affirm it, you must say the same of all ceremonies of the same importance, and so must make a hundred new Articles of Faith, even of Cere∣monies and such little things, and make them all necessary to Christianity and Salvation? And is not this to make a new Gospel, Christianity, and Church, and to turn Christ's easie Yoke into a worse than the slavery of Pharisaical Traditions? And is not this to shut all, or almost all men out of Heaven? No one on earth doth know that this, and all such ceremonies, and inventions of men are lawful: And must every one know it that will be a Christian, or have his child made one? Or must we all (as necessary to Christianity) believe all such things lawful if the Clergy do but say they are? And what if the Clergy in one Land say it is, and in another, say it is not: Must both be believed? Have wise Bishops no fitter penalty to enforce their usurping Canons by, than denying Christendom and Salvation? One would think it should be enough for the Preachers of humility to say, [We are so wise that he that differeth practically from us in that which we call an indifferent ceremony, and he calls a sinful corruption of baptism, shall be punished as much as Swearers, Drunkards and Fornicators be, or shall be made a slave with his Children] without denying them Christianity and Sal∣vation. But the best is, all cannot keep men out of Heaven that boast of the power of the Keys; and there is one Lawgi∣ver who is able to save and to destroy.

L.

You make a heinous cruelty of it, as if it were oppression and ty∣ranny to souls, and they say that they impose nothing on you but things indifferent.

M.

Must their indifferent things be enforced with so great penalty as damnation? If every one cannot love every Dish that they love, or get down every Pill that they give him, but he be famish'd therefore, or have his thro at cut wi∣der? I had rather live and die a Chimney-sweeper, or a Chan∣nel

Page 77

cleanser, or a Keeper of Swine, than a Bishop that should put Christ's Disciples and their seed, whom he commandeth them to baptize, Mat. 28. 19. from his Covenant and Church, and specially when themselves make Baptism more necessary and certainly saving, than it is.

L.

But you may venture to baptize such if you will.

M.

What, when I have covenanted Assent and Consent to all things in their Book, and subscribed to use no other form in bapti∣zing; and also must be cast out for it?

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.