Page 160
Quest. 8. Whether the Books called Apocrypha, be not Scripture?
These Books commonly called Apocrypha, are so called from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 abseondo, a thing hid, because the authority of them is not known to the Church: and in testimony of Faith, those Books must not at all be produced. The Church of Rome owns them as part of the Canon, but the Catholick Church did ever exclude their Authority: For,
- 1. They were never used by the Jews, neither in their Temples, nor in their Synagogues; the Jews were always Gods Library Keepers. To them were committed the Oracles of God, Rom. 3.2. Now these being never used nor committed to them, cannot be Gods Oracles: and by consequence, their authority is not binding.
- 2. They never received any countenance from the gospel, they are never mentioned as a Rule, or as Books wherein the will and minde of God was made known to men, which Christ would never have neglected to do had they been so: yea, as he chid the Pharisees for putting false glosses upon the Law; surely he would have upbraided them sharply, for taking away so great a part of the body of the Law. Our Lord Jesus mentions no other parts of the Scriptures then Moses, Psalms, and the Prophets, Luke 24 44, 4••. of which the Apocrypha is no part.
- 3. There are many things in those Books false, both in Histo∣ry and in Doctrine; much non-sense, and against both sense, rea∣son and Canonical Scripture are there many passages.
- 4. The Author of the second Book of Mac. Mac. 2.2.23. In∣genuously confesses, that that Book was only an abridgment, or compend of those five Books of the Wars of the Jews, writ by one Iason a Cyrenean; and great sweat, pains, and labour it cost hi•• so to do. This was no fit work for the Spirit of God to abridge the long books writ by Iason, that men might have more pleasure