this twey Crafftes nemed wer mych more nedful in the Old Law, the New Testa∣ment has voyded these and many other.
I suppose it is not necessary, after the Perusal of this Piece, to observe that the Romish Clergy cast those Crimes upon the Lollards, whereof themselves were guilty, and which the Lollards laid to their Charge in the Face of Heaven and Earth.
It will be said perhaps that this Petition contains several Errors: I own it: but we are to observe, 1st, That it is part of the Frailty of Mankind, to fall into the contrary Extream, whilst we endea∣vour to avoid those things that appear to us to be mortal. 2dly, That these Failings may be easily extenuated by the same Charity which we commonly make use of, when we speak of the Ancien∣est Fathers of the Church.
But this will some object, respects only the Lollards of England, and cannot be extended to the justifying of the Lollards of Germa∣ny, who might have been guilty of the Crimes whereof they are accused. To this Objection I answer: 1st, That since the Lol∣lards, according to the Testimony of Kilianus, reported by M. du Cange, were the same with the Waldenses; the Bishop of Meaux hath already drawn up their Apology, by maintaining that they differed only in a very few things from the Papists. 2dly, That if one should reject the Bishop's Opinion, yet sufficient Matter for their Justification may be found in the Writings of the more honest Authors of the Romish Communion, such as Ae∣neas Sylvius and some others, without speaking of their own Writings or Apologies, whereof we have some few Remnants printed.
Be it as it will, to return to our English Lollards; Fox in his Acts and Monuments, gives us a Bull of Pope Boniface IX, di∣rected to John Bishop of Hereford, to oblige him to put King Richard II, upon persecuting of them. As likewise the Bull sent to King Richard on the same Subject, which imports,