Tha the Hebrew tongue (so called afterward of Heber) was the first language vpon the earth, and remained in his family when that great confusion was. CHAP. 11.
VVHerefore euen as sinne wanted not sonnes when they had all but one language, (for so it was before the deluge, and yet all deserued to perish therein but Noah and his family) so when mans presumption was punished with his languages confusion, whence the Citty Babilon, their proud worke, had the name, Hebers (a) house failed not but kept the old language still. Where-vpon as I said, Heber was reckoned the first of all the sonnes of Sem, who begot each of them an whole nation: yet was hee the fift from Seth in descent. So then be∣cause this language remained in his house, that was confounded in all the rest, (being credibly held the onely language vpon earth before this) hence it had * 1.1 the name of the Hebrew tongue, for then it was to bee nominally distinct from the other tongues, as other tongues had their proper names. But when it was the tongue of all, it had no name, but the tongue or language of man-kinde, wherein all men spake. Some may say: if that the earth was diuided by the languages in Phalechs time, Hebers sonne, it should rather haue beene called his name then Hebers: O but wee must vnderstand that (b) Heber did therefore giue his sonne Phalec such a name, that is, diuision, because hee was borne vnto him iust at the time when the earth was diuided, so meanes the Scripture when it saith, in his dayes the earth was deuided. For if Heber were not liuing when the confusion be∣fell, the tongue that was to remaine in his family should not haue had the name from him: and there wee must thinke that it was first vniuersall, because the con∣fusion of tongues was a punishment, which Gods people were not to cast off: Nor was it for nothing that Abraham could not communicate this his language vnto all his generation, but onely to those that were propagate by Iacob, and a∣rising into an euident people of God, were to receiue his Testament, and the Sauiour in the flesh. Nor did Hebers whole progenie beare away this language, but onely that from whence Abraham descended. Wherefore though there be no godly men euidently named, that liued at the time when the wicked built Babylon: yet this concealement ought not to dull, but rather to incite one to inquire further. For whereas we read that at first, men had all one language, and that Heber is first reckoned of all the sonnes of Sem, beeing but the fift of his house downeward, and that language which the Patriarches and Prophets vsed in all their words and writings, was the Hebrew: Verily when woe seeke where that tongue was preserued in the confusion (being to bee kept amongst them to whom the confusion could be no punishment) what can wee say but that it was preserued vnto this mans family of whome it had the name? and that this is a great signe of righteousnesse in him, that where as the rest were afflicted with the confusion of their tongues, hee onely and his family was acquit of that af∣fliction. But yet there is another doubt: How could Heber and his sonne Phalec become two seuerall nations, hauing both but one language? And truly the He∣brew tongue descended to Abraham from Heber, and so downe from him vntill