St. Augustine, Of the citie of God vvith the learned comments of Io. Lod. Viues. Englished by I.H.

About this Item

Title
St. Augustine, Of the citie of God vvith the learned comments of Io. Lod. Viues. Englished by I.H.
Author
Augustine, Saint, Bishop of Hippo.
Publication
London :: Printed by George Eld,
1610.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Christianity and other religions -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A22641.0001.001
Cite this Item
"St. Augustine, Of the citie of God vvith the learned comments of Io. Lod. Viues. Englished by I.H." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A22641.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Of such as hold that the reasonable creatures onely are parts of the diuine essence. CHAP. 13.

IF they say indeed, that all things in the whole world do not participate essence with God, but yet all reasonable creatures doe truly, I cannot see how that can stand. Then all the world is not God; for otherwise how can they keepe brute beastes from beeing part of him? But what needes all this? Lette vs go but vn∣to this reasonable creature, man; can there be a more damnable absurdity, then to beleeue that part of Gods essence is beaten, when an offending childis beaten? To make the subsistence of almighty God, be so lasciuious, vniust, wicked and damna∣ble, as diuers men are: What man can indure to heare it but hee that is absolutely

Page 174

madde: lastly how can God bee iustly angry with those that doe not worshippe him, when as they are partes of his owne selfe that are guilty? So then, they are forced to say that euery particular godde hath his life and subsistence by him-selfe, and that they are not peeces of one another, but each one that is parti∣cularly knowne, must haue his peculiar worshippe: that is knowne I say, because they cannot all bee knowne. Ouer all whome, Iupiter beeing King, thence it comes (as I imagine) that they beleeue him to bee the sole erecter and protector of Romes Monarchy. For if it were not hee that didde it, whome should they thinke able to performe so great a worke? each one hauing his peculiar taske already so distinctty assigned, that one must by no meanes meddle with that which was vnder the charge of another. So then the conclusion is, it must needs bee onely the King of goddes, that erected and preserued this Kingdome of men.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.