A briefe of the art of rhetorique Containing in substance all that Aristotle hath written in his three bookes of that subject, except onely what is not applicable to the Engligh tongue.

About this Item

Title
A briefe of the art of rhetorique Containing in substance all that Aristotle hath written in his three bookes of that subject, except onely what is not applicable to the Engligh tongue.
Author
Aristotle.
Publication
London :: Printed by Tho. Cotes, for Andrew Crook, and are to be sold at the black Bare in Pauls Church-yard,
[1637?]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Rhetoric, Ancient.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A21323.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A briefe of the art of rhetorique Containing in substance all that Aristotle hath written in his three bookes of that subject, except onely what is not applicable to the Engligh tongue." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A21323.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 8, 2025.

Pages

CHAP. 17. Of Interrogations, Answers and lests.

THe times wherein tis fit to aske ones Adversary a questi∣on, are chiefely foure.

    Page 199

    • 1. The first is, when of two Propositions that conclude an Absurdity, he has already utte∣red one; and we would by Inter∣rogation draw him to confesse the other.
    • 2. The second, when of two Propositions that conclude an Absurdity, one is manifest of it selfe, and the other likely to bee fetcht out by a question; then the Interrogation will be seasonable; and the absurd Conclusion is pre∣sently to be inferr'd, without ad∣ding that Proposition which is manifest.
    • 3. The third, when a man would make appeare that his Adversary does contradict himselfe.
    • 4. The fourth, when a man would take from his Adversary such shifts as these, In some sort 'tis so; In some sort 'tis not so.

    Out of these Cases 'tis not fit to Interrogate. For hee whose

    Page 200

    question succeedes not is thoght vanquished.

    To Equivocall questions, a man ought to Answer fully, and not to be too breefe.

    To Interrogations which wee foresee tend to draw from us an Answer contrary to our purpose, we must together with our An∣swer presently give an Answer to the objection, which is implyed in the question.

    And where the question exact∣eth an Answer that concludeth against us, we must together with our Answer presently distin∣guish.

    Iests are dissolved by serious and grave discourse: and grave discourse is deluded by Iests.

    The severall kinds of Iests are set downe in the Art of Poetry.

    Whereof one kind is Ironia, and tends to please ones selfe.

    The other is Scurrility, and

    Page 201

    tends to please others.

    The latter of these has in it a kind of basenesse: the former may become a man of good breeding.

    Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.