CHAP. 17. Of Interrogations, Answers and lests.
THe times wherein tis fit to aske ones Adversary a questi∣on, are chiefely foure.
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
THe times wherein tis fit to aske ones Adversary a questi∣on, are chiefely foure.
Out of these Cases 'tis not fit to Interrogate. For hee whose
question succeedes not is tho••ght vanquished.
To Equivocall questions, a man ought to Answer fully, and not to be too breefe.
To Interrogations which wee foresee tend to draw from us an Answer contrary to our purpose, we must together with our An∣swer presently give an Answer to the objection, which is implyed in the question.
And where the question exact∣eth an Answer that concludeth against us, we must together with our Answer presently distin∣guish.
Iests are dissolved by serious and grave discourse: and grave discourse is deluded by Iests.
The severall kinds of Iests are set downe in the Art of Poetry.
Whereof one kind is Ironia, and tends to please ones selfe.
The other is Scurrility, and
tends to please others.
The latter of these has in it a kind of basenesse: the former may become a man of good breeding.