differed from their vsuall maner of imbattailing; and therefore it was called ag∣men
quadratum, or a square march, inasmuch as it kept the same disposition of
parts, as were obserued in quadrata Acie. For that triple forme of imbattailing,
which the Romaines generally obserued in their fights, hauing respect to the di∣stances
between each battel, contained almost an equal dimension of front and
file: and so it made Aciem quadratam; and when it marched, Agmen quadratum.
Polybius expresseth the same in effect, as often as the place required circum∣spection;
but altereth it somewhat in regard of the cariages: for he saith that in
time of danger, especially where the countrey was plaine and Chāpion, and gaue
space & free scope to cleere themselues, vpon anie accident, the Romains mar∣ched
in a triple battel, of equal distāce one behind an other, euery battel hauing
his seueral cariages in front: And if they were by chance attacked by an enemy,
they turned themselues according to the oportunity of the place, either to the
right or left hande, and so placing their cariages on the one side of their army,
they stood imbattailed ready to receiue the charge.
The contrary forme of marching, where the place afforded more security, &
gaue scope to conueniency, they named agmen longum; when almost euery ma∣niple
or order, had their seueral cariages attending vpon them, & stroue to keep
that way which they found most easie, both for thēselues & their impediments.
Which order of a march, as it was more commodius then the former, in regard
of particularity, so was it vnsafe and dangerous, where the enemy was expected:
And therfore Caesar much blamed Sabinus and Cotta, for marching, when they
were deluded by Ambiorix, longissimo agmine; as though they had receiued
their aduertisements from a friend, and not from an enemy.
And albeit our moderne wars are far different, in quality, frō them of ancient
times; yet in this point of discipline, they cannot haue a more perfect direction,
then that which the Romaines obserued, as the two poles of their motions, sa∣fety
and conueniency: whereof the first dependeth chiefely vpon the prouident
disposition of the leaders; and the other wil easily follow on, as the commodity
of euerie particular shal giue occasion.
Concerning safety in place of danger, what better course can bee taken then
that maner of imbattailing, which shall be thought most conuenient, if an ene∣my
were present to confront them? for a well ordered march must either carie
the perfect forme of a battell, or containe the distinct principles and elements
thereof, that with little alteration it may receiue that perfection of strength,
which the fittest disposition can affoord it. First therefore, a prudent and circum∣spect
leader, that desireth to frame a strong and orderly march, is diligentlie to
obserue the nature and vse of each weapon in his army, howe they may be pla∣ced
for greatest vse and aduantage, both in respect of their different and con∣curring
qualities, as also in regard of the place wherein they are managed: and
this knowledge will consequentlie inferre the best and exactest disposition of
imbattailing, as the said forces are capable of; which if it may be obserued in a
march, is no way to be altered. But if this exactnes of imbattailing wil not admit
conuenient cariage of such necessarie adiuncts, as pertaine to an armie; the
inconuenience is to bee relieued, with as little alteration from that rule, as in