QVEST. XLVI. Why Man doth not Smell so well as many other Creatures.
PLato in Timaeo, and Theophrastus in the sixth chapter of his sixth book de causis plantarum together with many other who haue written of this subiect, all of them, I say, with one consent doe acknowledge that the Sense of Smelling is more dull in men then in many other Creatures.
The same doth Aristotle auouch in the fourth chapter of his booke de sensu & sensili, where hee also addeth that of all the senses this Sense of Smelling in man is most sluggish and dull, which also he confirmeth in the 92. text of his 2. book de Anima.
The truth of this opinion is very euident by the example of other creatures as Dogges, * 1.1 Hogs, Crowes, Bees and other birds and beasts which are able a farre off to wind, as wee say, the sent of any thing. But man is constrayned to moue the obiect euen vnto the Nose and yet he is not able to discerne or perceiue any smels but those, that are so strong that they alter the Sense either into pleasure or paine. Add hereto, that many brute beastes doe know more by their smels then man can attaine to by all his senses, as the Hound that * 1.2 hunts vpon the cold foote of a Hare or a Deare, yea they can in the night follow a man, steps and worke out his way through a thousand difficulties and intanglements or permix∣tion of other Smels. So we see also that in the darke a Dogge will know his owne ma∣ster from a great many other men onely by his smell. A Tyger being robbed of her whelps will finde them out againe by her smell. Now none of these odours can the Sense of smelling in man apprehend.
The reason hereof, Aristotle in the place before quoted referreth vnto the fault, not of the faculty, but of the Organ. For this Organ is cold and very moyst, but the obiect hot and * 1.3 dry: now it is necessary that the Organ should potentially bee such as the subiect is actu∣ally. So that when sensation is made the obiect may worke vpon the instrument and con∣uert