that this medium be voyde of all sensible qualities, for otherwise it would bring the obiect adulterated or defiled to the Organ and affect the Sense with a proper quality of his owne: VVherefore no compounded body is fit for this function, because all compoun∣ded things are sensible of themselues.
If you obiect that there be no Elements exquisitely pure, and that therefore none of them can be a fit medium being themselues sensible. I grant indeede that no Element that is neere vs is perfectly pure, yet that Ayre that is neere vs wherein we liue doth ex∣ceed the rest in puritie, and is cleare from all qualities except Tactile, so that it may be ac∣counted for a medium to all the rest of the Sense except the Touch.
And is there then one medium seruing to all the Senses?
Yea, for this is the conclusion which is inferred from the former premises, to wit, be∣cause this alone is most pure, and is alwayes present with vs, this alone is continu∣ally in the middest betweene the Organ and the obiect, this is alwayes close adioyning and touching both the Organ and the obiect. The Ayre therefore alone serueth for a medium to the Sight as it is Traculent; to the Hearing as it is sounding; to the Smell as it is capable of odours.
But it may be obiected, that if the Ayre be the onely meane of the Senses, then would it follow that Fishes which liue in the water haue no Sense.
I answer, that for their sight the water serueth for a medium, but other Senses they haue none (saith Placentinus) sauing their Tast and Touch, and these two haue neede of a medium, yet they haue these Senses also but imperfect; but if any man will yet more in∣stantly vrge, that they haue the Sense of hearing, we grant they may heare but most imper∣fectly, and for such imperfect sensation the water serues in steed of a medium; but we speak here of perfect Sensation, where as the Sensation of Fishes is not simply perfect, but on∣ly in their owne kind, to wit, so farre foorth as they haue need of it.
Lastly, this condition of the medium is required to the perfect performance of Sense, namely, that it bee not too spatious or ample, and also that it bee not too narrow or little. But what is the limit or extent of this medium, that is, how farre or wide it ought to extend it selfe, is impossible to be determined, for this limit or extent must almost infinitely be va∣ryed according to the magnitude, paruity and vehemency, as also according to the vigor & strength, or imbecillity and weakenesse of the Sense: For we doe not discerne Mountains, Cities and whole Countryes but a farre off, and lesser things wee do not see except they be neere at hand. So we doe not perfectly and without offence to the Organ heare a vehe∣ment sound, except there bee a great distance betwixt the Sence and the obiect; nor a low voyce except we be neare vnto it. And the same reason is of the rest.