That it is lawfull to sweare, it appeareth by the Law, Deut. 6.13. By the Prophets: Ieremie heere. Esai, (Chap. 45. Ver. 23.) more earnest∣ly: I have sworne by My Selfe, the word is gone out of My mouth and shall not returne, That every knee shall bow to Me, & every tongue shall sweare by Me. David, Psal. 63. ult. Laudabuntur omnes, qui iurant per Eum. By the practise of the Saints, not only under Moses; but, under the Law of Nature. Abraham sweareth. Gen. 21.24. Isaac sweareth, Gen, 26.31. Iacob sweareth, Gen. 31.33. Now, our Saviour Christ came not to destroy the Law and the Prophets in those things wherin they agree with the Law of Na∣ture: Therefore, not to take away an oath.
Whereas, they object first: That it standeth not with Christian profession, but was tolerated, as an unperfect thing, under the Law. We answere: It cannot be reckoned an imperfection, to sweare. For that, not onely Abraham, the patterne of humane perfection, both sware himselfe, Gen. 21.24. and put his servant to an oath, Gen. 24.3. But, even the Angels, neerer then we to perfection, sware both under the Law (Dan. 12.7.) and under the Gospell (Apoc. 10.6.) And, not onely they, but even God himselfe (in whom are all perfections) Gen. 22.16. and Psal. 110.4. So that, it cannot be imagined an imperfection.
Besides, the holy Apostles, the most perfect Christians, have in urgent causes done the like. 2. Corinth. 1.23. I call God for a record against mine owne soule, and 1. Cor. 15.31. By our reioicing which I have in Christ Iesus our Lord: which place cannot be avoided, having in the Greeke, the word (Nη) never used, but in an oath onely.
Whereas secondly, they object our Saviour's saying, I say unto you sweare not at all: The Auncient Writers answere, that our Saviour Christ in the very same place, not reproving the other part, Reddes autem Domino iuramenta tua, meant not to take all oathes away: But must be understood according to the Pharisee's erroneous glosse of this Comman∣dement, which he entended to overthrow, by opposing to dictum est an∣tiquis, Ego autem dico: Which was of two sorts. 1. For first, it see∣meth, they understood it of periurie alone: So that, if a man forsware not himselfe, he might sweare any oath. And so Christ reproveth not onely false, but all rash and unadvised swearing.
2. Secondly, it seemeth, they had this conceipt: So a man sware not by the great Name of God, all was well; He might sweare by any crea••ure at his pleasure: and so Christ willeth, not to sweare at all, by any creature.
Though indeed, we hold in Divinitie, that Iurare, of and by it selfe considered, is an act forbidden, no lesse then Occîdere. And that, as it is an absolute countermand, Non occîdes, and yet the Magistrate, by due course of Iustice, executing a malefactor is commended: So is it like∣wise