The art or crafte of rhetoryke

About this Item

Title
The art or crafte of rhetoryke
Author
Cox, Leonard, fl. 1572.
Publication
[Imprinted at London :: In Fletestrete by saynt Dunstones chyrche, at the sygne of the George, by me Robert Redman,
The yere of our lorde god a thousande, fyue hundred and two and thyrty [1532]]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Rhetoric -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19517.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The art or crafte of rhetoryke." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19517.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 10, 2024.

Pages

¶ Of a Theme compounde.

EUery Theme compounde: ey∣ther it is proued trewe or fals. Now whether thou wylt pu•…•… or improue any thyng: it must be done by argument. And yt any Theme compounde: be it Logicall or Rhetorycall / it must be referred to the rules of Logike by thē to be proued trew or fals. For this is the dyfference that is betwene these two sciences / that the Lo∣gician in dysputynge obserueth certayne rules for the settynge of his wordes being solicitous that there be spokē no more nor no lesse than the thynge requyreth / & that it be euin as plaily spokē as it is thought. But the Rhethorician seketh about & bo∣roweth where he can asmoche as he may for to make the symple and playne Logi∣call argumentes gaye & delectable to the 〈◊〉〈◊〉. So than the sure iugement of argu∣mentes

Page [unnumbered]

or reasons must be lerned of the logician / but the crafte to set thē out with pleasaunt figures and to delate the mater belongeth to the Rhetorician. As in Mi∣loes cause / of whome was made mencion afore. ¶ A logician wolde briefly argue / who so euer violently wyll slee an other / may lawfully of the other be slayne in his defence. Clodius wolde vyolently haue s•…•…ain Milo / wherfore Clodius might lau∣fully be slayne of Milo in Miloes owne defence. And this argument the logicians call a Sillogisme in Dar•…•… / whiche Tully in his oracion extendeth that in foure or fyue leues it is scant made an ende of / nor no man can haue knowlege whether Tul∣lies argument that he maketh in his ora∣cyon for Milo / be a good argumente or nat / and howe it holdeth / excepte he can by Logyke reduce it to the perfecte and briefe forme of a Sillogisme / takynge in the meane season of the Rhetorycyans what ornamentes haue ben cast to for to lyght and augment the oracyon / and to gyue it a maiestie.

¶ The places out of whome are founde argumentes for the prouynge or impro∣uynge of compounde Themes / are these folowynge.

Page [unnumbered]

  • Diffinicion lyke
  • Cause contrary
  • Partes

OF the places of argumen∣tes shall be spoken hereaf∣ter. For as touchyuge thē in all thynges the Rheto∣rician & Logician do agre. But as concernynge the crafte to fourme argumentes whan thou hast foūde them in theyr places / that must be lerned of the Logician / where he trea∣teth of the fourme of sillogismes / 〈◊〉〈◊〉 •…•…es and inductions.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.