professeth, that he doeth it of malice? neuerthelesse for all this in∣conuenience and abuse that may happen, it will not be thought conuenient (I trust) to damme vp the way from euery man both Iudge & partie, to preferre suites against offenders. For if it should so be, in short time there would bee neither Iudge nor other, but lewd persons onely; and they might liue as they list.
Yea, but it seemeth vnreasonable (will some man say) that a man should be called into question and not to know his Ac∣cuser. Surelie if the way of proceeding by Accusation be taken, he is to know him: but when by Enquirie, though for the most part the Denouncer is knowen, yet there be many weightie and very considerable causes, why euen witnesses in cause of heresie: and much lesse those that gaue the information, should not bee knowen; which euerie man of himselfe, without rehearsall, can weie and call to mind.
Besides, this obiection maketh nothing against all proceeding ex officio. For when it is grounded and instituted vpon a Present∣ment by officers speciallie appointed, their names are knowen to him whose processe is made. Yet I must tell you, that hereby it commeth oft times to passe, that meane men in parishes abroad, and for very foule crimes, do rather make choise to be bold with their oath and conscience, then with a delinquent, whom they haue some occasion to feare.
But (I pray) what necessitie is there (in Iustice) of knowing the Relatours? may not a Iurie endite a man without any cause openly appearing, as when the matter is either knowen to some of them aforehand, or the Euidence (as some times happeneth) is not giuen openlie? which cases happening; the partie endited shall neuer know who gaue the information, because they are sworne to keepe secret the Queenes, their owne, & their felowes counsell. Which course for the trouble of the partie supposed to be delinquent, doeth amount to as much, as if the Iudge ex officio mero had done it.
When the Lords of the Counsell haue a supposed malefactor in examination, are they bound in Iustice, or were it but good poli∣cie to signifie vnto him, who it is that giues the information; and to confront them together at first dash? but howsoeuer these (by circumstances) should be thought fit to be caried, it is neither to