A reply to Dr. Mortons generall Defence of three nocent [sic] ceremonies viz. the surplice, crosse in baptisme, and kneeling at the receiving of the sacramentall elements of bread and wine.
About this Item
Title
A reply to Dr. Mortons generall Defence of three nocent [sic] ceremonies viz. the surplice, crosse in baptisme, and kneeling at the receiving of the sacramentall elements of bread and wine.
Author
Ames, William, 1576-1633.
Publication
[Amsterdam] :: Printed [by Giles Thorp],
in yeare 1622.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659. -- Defence of the innocencie of the three ceremonies of the Church of England.
Church of England -- Customs and practices -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19178.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A reply to Dr. Mortons generall Defence of three nocent [sic] ceremonies viz. the surplice, crosse in baptisme, and kneeling at the receiving of the sacramentall elements of bread and wine." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19178.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.
Pages
SECT. V.
IN one place of Scripture yet, viz. Dan. 1 8, the Def. thinketh
he hath some advantage; because Calvin interpreteth it other∣wise
then of ceremoniall pollution. But therein the Abridge∣ment
followed that interpretation which is most generally, recei∣ved:
for which see Iunius in his Commentary upon the place.
And suppose that pollution vvas not ceremoniall or idolatrous,
yet I hope the Def. vvill not say but if the meat had been so
descriptionPage 62
polluted Daniel vvould haue absteyned from it.
Take therefore some other testimonies to proue your assertion, saith
the Def. So confidently as if he knew of no ••estimonies vvhich
he had not answered. What can one say to him that vvill not take
that which is thrust into his hands, and yet calleth for more, as
if he could finde none?
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.