A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

About this Item

Title
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Author
Ames, William, 1576-1633.
Publication
[Amsterdam] :: Printed [by the successors of Giles Thorp],
anno 1633.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Burges, John, 1561?-1635. -- Answer rejoyned to that much applauded pamphlet of a namelesse author, bearing this title: viz. A reply to Dr. Mortons generall Defence of three nocent ceremonies, &c.
Church of England -- Liturgy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19142.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19142.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Open Revilings of the Persons of Non-conformi∣tants: or secret inducements to bring them into distast.

In 52. pag: of the Praeface: some Noncōformists are brought in, & sayd to be of that temper: that vvhen the remove all of Ce∣rem. only vvas mentioned: Their ansvver vvas.

They must not have a hoof-behinde

Page [unnumbered]

them: And the note in the Margent tells us.

  • 1. This Sr. Fran: VValsingham told Mr. Knevvstubs, of vvhom I had it.
  • 2. It is a ridiculous supposi∣tion; its a malitious surmise; all this scurrilous bundle is of no use, unlesse it be to ingraft himselfe, into the affections, (vvhich he calleth the consciences) and ap∣plause of his ovvne partie. p. 633. Preface.
  • 3. These tvvo notes, note you to be an egregious vvrangler. p. 6.
  • 4. Did ever sober-man reason thus? p. 61.
  • 5. I should be sory to fynde so much vvayvvardnes, & fals∣hood, in any man of our Religion; but cannot but vvonder at it, in

Page [unnumbered]

  • a man pretending more then or∣dinary sincerity p. 15.
  • 6. Hovv ever these men, vvho in effect say to all other men, stand backe, I am more holy then thou, &c.
  • 7. VVhat a shame is it for men to glory of sincerity, for refu∣sing Cerem. And use no sincerity in alleadging authors, 284.
  • 8. But that use vvhich the learned divines call Historicall, these men call Religious, that they might by a false eare-mark, bring us into suspicion abroad, & into hatred vviht our Re∣ligious people at home, and yet they vvould be counted sin∣cere men. 303.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.