A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

An Alphabeticall TABLE Of the Principall Occurrents in this FRESH SVIT. Where note that 1. p. and 2. p. at the end, sometimes of the number, directing to the page, stands for 1. part, and 2. part.

A.

AVgustin what he thought, but durst not speak.

p. 33.2. p.

His judgement of signes.

p. 223.

His Condemning the very nature of such Ce∣remonies, where some choise things are noted.

p. 228.

Adjuncts called Parts by Ramus,

p. 156.2. p.

Anabaptists occasioned reformation of Cermon.

p. 19.1. p. and 457.2. p.

B.

BEzas cleare judgement of Episcopall autho∣rity.

p. 91.1. p.

Beza expresseth the Com∣mune sentence of our Divines, of the ancient Bishops, viz▪ that they were ever too busy a∣bout Ceremonies.

p. 228

Bucers wish about Holy∣dayes, viz. that there were not so much as one left, besides the Lords-day.

Baines▪ his Syllogisme a∣gainst our Ceremonies: confirmed

p. 258.

Brightmans answere to Iuel.

p. 503.

Babingtons Comment. on Levit. 10.1. observable a∣gainst our Ceremonies.

p. 24.2. p.

Bradshaws opinion of in∣different things opened.

p. 161.

Bellarmins answer to the Law of the O. Test. pre∣scribing all things to the Iewes.

p. 13.2. p.

His Proof ••or the Chur∣ches liberty to institute Ceremonies from Purim and the Feast of Dedicat.

p. 246.

He saith as much for their, as we for our Cer.

p. 488.

Blumfeild a Persequutor threatned a good man for the Surplice.

p. 18.1. p.

Bernards answer to the Virgin Maries Image, bidding him Good mor∣row.

p. 364.

C.

CAsuits admit nothing beside their order.

p. 65.1. p.

Chokim the Hebrew name of Ceremon. finely laid open.

p. 35.1. p.

Conformers miserable A∣pologie.

p. 13.1. p.

Ceremonies their dispute how ancient; opposed by Waldenses, Martyrs, removed in Helveria.

p. 8.15.1. p.

Other things ridiculous yet as tolerable, if they had but institution from the Convocation-howse as a May pole ith Church, or a straw in a Childs hand at Bapt.

p. 17.

Ceremonies such as ours, why naught.

p. 18.

Ceremonies how defined, examined.

p. 21.

Ceremonies laid out in 4. things

p. 23.

Ceremonies holy.

p. 129.2. p. and 178.186.

Their Worship.

p. 132.2. p. and 298.

Ceremonies must have a rule for number.

p. 144.2. p.

Ceremonies Popish may yet be Iewish.

p. 218.

See also.

p. 273.

Ceremonies by Institu∣tion to what Comman∣dement they belong.

p. 301.

Ceremonies condemned for speaking out of place.

p. 364.

Ceremonies, Clowts that have layen on the plague foares of Idolatrie.

p. 367.

Ceremonies cānot be de∣duced from the kinds na∣med by the Rej.

p. 482.

Ceremonies used by us never objects of Idol: an∣swered.

p. 401.

Ceremonies consequent∣ly imposed as belonging to giving honour to God, yet Superstitious.

p. 103.1. p.

Ceremonies single, dou∣ble, trebble.

p. 91.2. p.

Ceremonies the Garmēts of Religion whereof the Scots mans jest.

p. 94.

Church repraesentative, to the life repraesented.

p. 88.1. p.

Church English and pri∣mative compared.

p. 403.

Calvins account of addi∣tions.

p. 121.2. p. 376.

What he saith to Cassan∣der, and to our Maisters of Cerem.

p. 122.2. p.

His admirable speech to the Lord Protector of England.

p. 389.

His moderation toward Popish Ceremonies, what See.

p. 400.

His inference, that, if the 3. Children in Dan. had followed the Counsell, and witt of our times; they needed never to have stood out against the Kings Commande∣ment.

p. 127.2. p.

His judgement of Cere∣monies cleared.

p. 240.

His opinion missinter∣preted by the Rej. an∣swered.

Chamiers answer to that of no new Cerem. brought in these days.

p. 295.

His famous Censure of Ceremonies Analogical and Sacramental, as idlely doeing that over againe, for which the Sacramēts were by Christ appoin∣ted.

p. 84.1. p.

Covels Sentence sleighted by the Rejoynd.

p. 208.

Christ the only authentick teacher.

p. 210.211.

Chemnitius his famous te∣stimony about additions.

p 249.

Cajetan a Cardinall of Rome would not be buried ith Church:

p. 469.

Conformity disuaded frō, by one that Conformd himself.

p. 474.

Circumcision Defended to be now lawfull by Def. & Rej.

p. 274.

Convocatiō howse not Clear∣ed by all that the Rej. can say.

p. 113.

Found Guilty of much evill: of perverting the Articles of religion, and s••tting thē out far worse, then they were in good K. Edwards time, de∣creeing lesse good, then the Councill of Trent.

p. 115.123.

Comlines.

p. 77.2.

1. Corinths. c. 14. which how interpreted by F••∣thers and Schoolmen, and more honestly then now adayes by Hierar hichs.

p. 53.2. p.

Contrariety, of Decencie and edification displea∣sing, yet Contrariety of rites serving thereunto, not so.

p. 117.2. p.

D.

Dr. Humphreys letter to the Bishops.

p. 269.

Dr. Davenats doctrine at Cambridg

p. 79.1. p.

Dr. Morton cals for abo∣lition of Superstition without delay.

p. 378.

Dr. Andrews speech to the Convocation.

p. 419. & 421.

Dr. Fulck forsook the Col∣lege for the Surplice

p. 473.

Distinctions of popish writers brought toge∣ther by Rive••us.

p. 299.

Distinction into Coma••d and allowance, Symboli∣zing with papists.

p. 142.

Distinctions of Against & beside.

p. 28.2. p.

Distinction of traditions into Divine, and Aposto∣licall rejected by Iunius

p. 335.

For denying of which distinction the Repl: was charged with unlearned∣nes, yet all the Rej. lear∣ning, and more put to it cannot make it good.

p. 336.

Dipping 3. times

p. 242.

E

EAsterday solemnized with a pascal lamb, by a late great Bp. of En∣gland.

p. 40.2. p.

Easter the first apple of strife, from the Bp. of Rome.

p. 85.448. and 440.

Evill of our doings ••o be put away, finely explained

p. 131.

F.

FAsting in what sense, worship.

p. 145.

Freewill offrings, no will worship.

p. 153.

Nor do warrant appoin∣ting of Cer.

p. 152.1. p. and 151.2.

Feasts of love, their ori∣ginal uncertain.

p. 334.

G.

GVnpowder stopt into an image.

p. 513.

H.

HOokers strang speech

p. 2.2. p

Hooper a Bp. refused the Surplice.

p. 135.

What he speaks of Bps. state.

p. 408.

Holy, either by infusion or inhaesion, the Def. absurd distinction

p. 179.

Human, with Bellarm. and the Rej. in one sense.

p. 302.

Hezekiah, whether he le••t

the images stand, set up by Col.

p 369.

I.

INtended observation.

p. 26.1. p.

Infants Communicants,

p. 37.2. p.

Iunius his remarkable speech about additions.

p. 89.2. p. and 252.

His sentence of images.

p. 286. and 290.

Images for use religious mainteyned and con∣demned by the Rej.

p. 237 283.

Images in Churches, not indifferent by the Homi∣lies against Idol.

p. 289.

Iuels prophesie about the crosse

p. 290

K.

KNeeling &c. proper worship by the Rej. grant

p. 138

L:

LVthers advise about yeilding

p. 97.2. p.

How he placed the Images to make them ridiculous

p. 285.

Latimers speech to the convocation, for which he was committed to the tower

p. 123.1. p

His comparison of Cer. and in a Sermon before K. Edw.

p. 148.2. p.

M:

MElancht free speech against mans inven∣tions

p. 152.1: p

His meaning opened

p: 141.2. p:

He disalloweth the Col∣lectiō of some from Act:

15: Ibid.

Mat. 15. and Marc: 7: of pharisies washing

p. 186 &c. and zz1

Ministers how they enter upon their Parishes in Engl:

p. 412:

N.

NOnresidents a carefull sort of them

p: 417

Negative argument usual with the best writers

p: 43.2. p.

O.

OPiniō wheter it were worship

p. 125.2. p.

Organs d••sliked by School∣men

p. 40••

Not used ith Popes chap∣pell

p: 430

••fficials cōmanding style when they enjoyne ex∣com.

p. 410

P.

••Ope Paul 4. offred to confirm our Ser∣••ice book witnessed by Dr, Morton

p. 203

••ope received the Host ••itting

p. 429

••apists opinion of their Cer. in regard of worship ••nd necessitie to salvatiō, ••nd the holines they put ••n them, together with ••heir operation, and effi∣••acy, no more then is ••••ofessed of ours.

See. p. ••.70. and 73.75.1. p. and ••03.315.

••••pists give liberty to the ••ulgar man to judg of ••••e Churches precepts

••. 79.1. p.

••heir judgement of idle ••er:

p. 74.2. p.

••hey & our mē agree in their answers to the place alleged, against adding to Gods worship.

p. 115

They deny operative vir∣tue to holy water

p. 294

Popish idolatrie compared with Heathenish

p. 518

Policie of old Bps. to win the Heathen by obser∣ving their holydais, con∣demned.

p. 432. see also p. 500

P. M. refused the Surplice in Oxford

p. 463

A remarkable speech of his about mens devises to stir up &c.

p. z11

Praelats power if they pleas to command all English∣men to be circumcised

p. 107.1. p.

Praela••s in a praemunire

p. 111.

Praelats greife when forced to deprive answ.

p. 108

Praelats office to make canons saith the Rejoyn.

p. 107

Parliament against silen∣cing for such non-con∣formity

p. 108. r.p:

Parl 1610. checkt the pre∣lats

p. 106.1. p.

Polanus cleered.

p. 148.1. p

Praying toward the East as ancient as any Cere∣monie.

p. 82.2. p.

R.

REjoynders bulls fre∣quently observed.

See p. 44.83.92-1. p. again p. 6.9.25.32.36.44.92.108 217.2. p.

Rej. noted for palpable error concerning inward worship

p. 1z7.1. p.

For Error again in

art

p. 138.

divinity

p. 138.

His dangerous speech that Christ had laid snares if etc.

p. 68.2. p.

S.

SAcred proper and re∣ductive, examined

p. 63.1. p.

Sacramentals what

p. 226.

Denied by pap. to work etc.

p. 227.

Condemned by Beza

p. 244.

Sacrament and Sacramen∣tals a foolish distinction

p. z33.

Saduces not so praecise.

p. zz0.

Sopping ith Sacrament

p. 36.2. p.

Subscription how requi∣red by parliament, and refused by none

p. 10••.1. p.

Superstition rightly defi∣ned.

p. 98.1. p. z15.236. by Polanus.

Superstition

negative.

p. 101.1. p:

Cast by preven∣tion on non Conformists

p. 34.

and finely taken off

p. 95. etc. and 312.

Superstition, how first oc∣casioned by yeilding too much to the infirmity of others,

p. 83.2. p.

Sadcels testimonie main∣teined

p. 234.

Surplice refused by a mi∣nister in Q. Eliz. dayes, and why

p. 435.

Swearing on a booke ho••

p. 357.

Souldjers new prest by the Rej.

p: 43••.

Scotlands judg. to the mi∣nisters of Engl.

p. 453.

T.

TExts alleged (viz. Ios. 6. and Iudg. 6.) for human Cer.

p. 491.

Trueth may be merry, noted in a fine speech of Tertulian to that effect

p. 437.

V.

Vrsins testimony about humā Cer.

p. 152.2. p

W.

WAldenses opposed Cerem. with such answers as now be used against them.

p. 8.1. p.

They used not the Crosse

p. 39.2. p.

Wittenburgh Confession

p. 231.

Whipping out of the tē∣ple twise don

p. 320.

Worship ridiculously de∣fined, examined.

p. 125.1. p.

Worship in what proper∣ly Consisting.

p. 132.2. p 163.168.

Worship is that which is above order and decency in worship.

p. 7z. z. p

Worship must be essētial, if worship.

p. 113. z. p.

Worship figurative what

p. 147.1. p. ult:

Worship applied to the Cer. by the Rej.

p. 154. z. p.

Worship proper, essentiall, necessarie, how under∣stood by the Rej.

p. 158.2. p.

Worship Circumstantiall, or accessorie not permit∣ted onely, prooved by a Sillogism from the Rej: ••elfe contradictions

p. 139.1. p

Worship true and good, if according to the will of God, not hindering it, the Papists Plea, as well as our mens.

ibid.

Worship, the parts of it, wha••

p. 113.2. p

Worship indifferent none

p. 171.

Worship whatsoever, ne∣cessarie.

p. 138.2. p

Yet will-worship may be

without that opinion

ibid.

Worship Popish and Sa∣crilegious mainteined under the same Colours of reverend manner, order, decencie among Papists

p. 143.1. p.

Worship in Cer:

p. 38.1. p.

Will worship distinguisht into lawfull and unlaw∣full.

p. 136.2. p:

Will worship not defended by papists.

p. 150.2. p.

Z.

ZAnchies judgement of our Cer. p 97. z. p. also of annexions and es∣sentials.

p. 155. &c. z. p:

Zeppers noble testimonie of human traditions.

p. z16.