Examination.
AGainst this Conclusion Anabaptists and Atheists barke. First we will heare their barkings / and then cast a crust in to the Dogs throate.
What soeuer was Ceremoniall, is abolished. But the obseruation precisely of a day for spirituall exercise was Ceremoniall: There fore euery such day abolished.
What if I graunt them the whole Argument (viz. That euery Day that was ceremoniall is abolished) what then? I speake no•• of a Day that was / but of a day that is: namely / not of such a Day as was once Ceremoniall (for the first day of the weeke / was neuer such a Ceremoniall day) but of a Day that now IS institutued in the new Testament: Theyr wynd therfore shakes no haner.
Yet because such a spirit shall not haue his owne will (to passe by the first proposition) I demaunde of him what day it was / that was so Cere∣moniall? was it the Day of Easter, of Pentecost, of Tabernacles, new Moone, months, Yeares? None of these I pleade for. But it was the Sabaot (or 7. day) that he speciallie speaks of: and this day he wold haue Ceremoniall / from Colos. 2.16.17. and therfore to end in Christ. What then / I speake not for that 7. day / but for the Day after / which is the 8. in regarde of 7. geingebefore / and is the first day of the weeke in regarde of the weeke / Yee (as before) to crosse the spirit in his way / who enuyes not somuch the Day as the exercise (becawse the standing and falling of Religion resteth in the precise obseruation of som Day) I demaund of him how he proues that 7. day a Ceremonie.