The state of the now-Romane Church Discussed by way of vindication of the Right Reuerend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of Exceter, from the weake cauills of Henry Burton. By H.C.

About this Item

Title
The state of the now-Romane Church Discussed by way of vindication of the Right Reuerend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of Exceter, from the weake cauills of Henry Burton. By H.C.
Author
Cholmley, Hugh, ca. 1574-1641.
Publication
London :: Printed [by Miles Flesher] for Nathaniel Butter,
1629.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656. -- Olde religion -- Early works to 1800.
Burton, Henry, 1578-1648. -- Seven vials -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18620.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The state of the now-Romane Church Discussed by way of vindication of the Right Reuerend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of Exceter, from the weake cauills of Henry Burton. By H.C." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18620.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 2, 2024.

Pages

Page 107

BVRTON.

Nothing lesse: yea she directly, not by consequence onely; directly (I say) shee denieth and destroyeth this foun∣dation: How? and where? in the Councell of Trent, Sess. 6. Can. 10. Siquis dixerit homines per ipsam Christi iustitiam formaliter iustos esse, Anathema sit: Is not this a direct, and flat expresse denyall of the founda∣tion?

Answer.

Is this an expresse, flat, and direct de∣nial of the foundatiō? then Melancthon, Caluin, Illyricus, and all sound and good Protestants doe expresly, flatly, and di∣rectly deny the Foundation: for all of them doe, and must hold this doctrine for accursed: and all the Ministers of the Church of England haue cause to be ashamed of your ignorance & bold∣nesse (Mr. Burton) who dare challenge the Church of Rome to denie the foun∣dation directly in that wherein she hol∣deth and confirmeth the truth of the Gospel: you must know therefore that in these words is condemned the dam∣nable

Page 108

doctrine of Andrew Osiander, and his followers; who taught and held, that a man is formally iustified by the very Righteousnesse by which Christ himselfe is essentially iust and righte∣ous, being partakers thereof by inhabi∣tation: This allegation therefore is a notable abuse not only of the Councel, but of your selfe and the Reader. See Bellarmine de Iustif. lib. 2. cap. 2. Sect. 2. His verbis: though himselfe offend therein also afterwards.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.