To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
IT is no where forbidden i•• holy scripture to minister the holy communion to lay person∣nes vnder one Kinde onely. This Positione is clear no such prohi∣bitione appearing in the scrip∣ture. And yf the Protestātes gro∣wndes of beleeuinge nothinge but what is proued by scripture were true; would sufficiently warrant the practise of the Ro∣man
churche in this poynt. But ••urther.
It is no where commaunded •• holy scripture to giue the holy ••ommunion vnder both kindes ••o the laye people. This Posi∣sion ys also cleare no such com∣maundement anie where appea∣ringe. For that which is sayd: doe* 1.1 ••his for remembrance of me: is spokē onely of the kinde of bread: and therfore doth well prouue the contraire: S. Paule in deed* 1.2 ••ddeth it to both kindes: therby also declaringe this holy mysterie taken ether under both or one kinde, to be a memoriall of Christ, and his passione: and ther∣fore doth rather proue the Catho∣lique Roman practice, then anie waye disproue yt. Thoughe the∣se wordes, doe rather giue power and auctoritie to the Apostles & priestes, to consecrate and offer the vnbloody sacrifice here insti∣tuted
Luc ca. 22. v. 19.
1 Corin. cap. 11.