Page 65
CHAP. 9. An examination of the Arminians defi∣nition of grace. (Book 9)
FOr the better vnderstanding of these men that pleade against the grace of God, We must obserue that one espe∣ciall ground of their errour is in this, that they conceiue and vnderstand a∣misse of grace. They take it for another thing then the Scriptures haue declared, and the Church of God from the Scriptures haue taken it to be. And there∣fore when they define grace, they say it is a morall perswasion. Arminius himselfe saith, it is lenis suasio: they admit no power of God here.
And are not these a strange kinde of men, that will make vnto themselues their owne grounds, and not take their grounds from the Scriptures? If this ground, which they so blindly begge were true, then were it indeed easie for them to proue many of their conclusions: that alike or generall grace is offered vnto all: that quantum ad Deum pertinet, for so much as is in God, one man receiueth as much grace as an other: that the difference is in mans free-will, in accepting or reiecting of grace: that grace may soone bee gotten, and soone lost altogether. But who gaue these men authority to make a definition contrary to that which the holy Scriptures haue de∣liuered.