selfes, ye God doth not loke vpon thē. Therfore although they be cōpelled to acknowledge som God, yet they do rob him of his glory, in withdraw∣yng frō him his power. For a•• God (as Paule witnesseth) can not deny hym selfe, bycause he continually abydeth like hym self: so is it truly sayd, that these men in faynyng God to be a dead and vayne ymage, do deny God. Moreouer it is to be noted, yt although they wrastle against theyr own naturall felyng, & do desire not only to shake out God frō thense, but also to destroye hym in heauen, yet their dull hardnesse can neuer so farre preuayle, but that God sometyme draweth them backe to his iudgemente seate. But forasmuche as they are not withholden with any feare from runnyng violently agaynst God: therfore it is certayn that there reigneth in theim a brutisshe forgetfulnesse of God, so longe as that blinde pang of rage dooeth so forcibly cary them.
So is that vayn defence ouerthrowen which many are wont to pre∣tende for excuse of their superstition. For they thynke, that any deuo∣tion [ 3] to religion suffiseth, what soeuer it be, thoughe it be neuer so much contrary to order and truthe. But they consyder not, that true religion ought to be framed according to the wil of God, as by a perpetual rule: and that God hymselfe abydeth alway like hym selfe, and is no imagi∣ned Ghost or fantasy, that may be diuersly fashioned after euery mans lykyng. And truely we may playnly se with how lying deceites, super∣scition mocketh God, while she goeth aboute to doo hym pleasure. For catchyng holde of those thynges in a maner only, whiche God hath te∣stified that he careth not for, she either contemptuously vseth, or openly refuseth those thinges that he appoynteth, and saithe to be pleasant vn∣to hym. Therefore whosoeuer dooe sette vp newe inuented formes of worshippyng God, they wourship and honour their owne dotyng deui∣ses: bycause they durste not so trifle with God, vnlesse they had fyrste fayned a God, agreyng with the folies of their triflynge toyes. Where∣fore the Apostle pronounceth, that that vnstayed and wandryng opini∣on of the maiestie of God, is a very ignorance of God. When (sayth he) ye knewe not God ye serued them, that in nature were no goddes. And in an other place he sayth: That the Ephesians were without a God at suche tyme as they strayed from the right knowledge of the one God. And at least in this case, it differeth not muche whether thou beleue one god or many, because in bothe cases thou departest from and forsakest the true God: whom when thou hast ones forsaken, ther is nothing left with thee but a detestable ydoll. It foloweth therfore, that we must de∣termyne with Lactantius, that there is no lawfully allowable religi∣on, but that which is ioyned with truthe.
There is also a seconde fault, that they neyther haue at any tyme any [ 4] consideration of God, but againste their willes, nor do approche to∣warde hym, til for all their holdynge backe they be forcibly drawen to hym: and euen then also they haue not a willynge feare that procedeth from reuerence of Goddes maiestie, but onely a seruile and constrained feare, whiche the iudgement of God wringeth out of them: which iud∣gement bycause they can not escape, therfore they dread it, but yet so as therwithall they abhorre it. And so that saying of Statius, that feare fyrst made goddes in the worlde, may be fittly spoken of vngodlynes, and of this kynde of vngodlynes onely. They that haue a mynde ab∣horryng