B.
Ze sirris quha raillis sua oft aganis the Paip
and papistis as ze cal thame vse to tribute
the inuention of monie thingis to the Pape,
bot quhen ze ar demandit in particular f•om
quhat Pape sik inuentions did proceid ze be∣cum
al dum, and hes na thing to speik. As
quhen ve demand zou quhat Pape inuentit
the sacrifice of the Messe, the Inuocation of
sanctis, Praying for the deid, and vther heidis
of religion quhilk ze haue callit in doubt. Sua
I desyre that ze proue that thing quhilk ze
say, and schau quhat Pape vas he that inuentit
the indulgencis, quhilk ze vil neuer be abil to
do. Nou becaus ze say that the indulgencis at
na thing bot the inuention of man, I vil de∣clare
that ze ar manifest impostors before tha
me all quha ar heir present.* I scheu before be
goddis vord that quhen the syn is remittit ve
aucht to vnderly sum tēporal pane the quhilk
vsis to be inionit efter a man haue maid con∣fession
of his synnis. Nou sen Christ hes ge∣uin
pouar to his kirk to bind and louse, euin
as pastors hes pouar to inioyne penance to
Page 18
men for thair synnis, sua thay haue pouar to
relax thair penance vnto thame, vtheruyse the
pastoris vald haue gretar pouar to bind nor
to louse, quhilk is cōtrare to the mearcie and
gudnes of God.* And thairfore S. Ambroise
monie hundreth zeiris syne in his buikis de
poenitentia aganis the Nouatians, did obiect
vnto thame, that thay did onlie bind men,
and na vayis lousit, aganis the ordinance and
institution of Christ.* Zea S. Paul him self as is
manifest in the secund to the Corinth, did gi∣ue
sik indulgence to him, quha had commit∣tit
the horrible cryme of incest, saying:
Giue I
haue pardonit zou onie thing, I haue appar∣donit
zou bering the persone of Christ Iesus.
Be the quhilkis vordis he testifeis maist cleir∣lie
that be the pouar and auctoritie grantit vn¦to
him be Christ he did relax sum pairt of
that Paenitence quhilk before vas inionit for
the said cryme of incest. And gif ze had plesit
to haue red the ancient vrittaris ze vald haue
persauit maist cleirlie hou in the tyme of the
persecutiō of the Romā emperoris as Decius,
and vtheris, this vse and custume vas keipit in
the kirk, that be the intercessiō of the Christia¦nis
quha var impresonit for thair faith, and re∣ligione
the bischopis and pastoris of the kirk
vsit to relax the paenitēce quhilk thay had in∣ioynit
for ony gret and vechtie crime.
* Of this
ve haue monie epistlis in S. Cyprian, threttene
hūdreth zeris syne and mair: zea thay quha fol¦louit
the heresie of Mōtanus did reproue the
Page [unnumbered]
the Papis of Rome that thay did grant sik
indulgencis to adulteraris, and vther siclyk
synners thruch the intercession of martyrs
impresonit.
* Quhair of I produce to zou
as ane sufficient vitnes Tertullian quha vrait
before fourtene hundreth zeiris. Sua the
indulgencis is na Papis inuention as ze ma∣ist
falslie preach to the people. Bot the or∣dinance
of Christ Iesus (practesit be his
Apostlis and the vniuersall kirk euer vnto
this present) groundit vpon the meritis of
his maist ptecious death and passiō quhilk a
•
applyit vntovs, for the satisfactiō of our synnis
and to supplie our vaiknes and imbecillitie in
that pairt: for quhat thing can be thocht
mair according to reason, nor that the ful and
perfyt satisfaction of the head supplie the vai¦knes
and imbecillitie of the mēbers,
* zea euin
the satisfaction of ane member may supplie
the satisfaction of ane vther, conforme to our
beleif I beleue the communion of sanctis. Bot
ze sirris, as ze haue na thing amāg zou bot syn
according to zour auin cōfession, It is na ma∣ruel
that ze deny the communion of sanctis.
M.
The Apostlis and Martirs ressauis glore aboue the
merit of al thair temporal afflictionis,* Becaus as vrit∣tis
S. Paul:
I esteme not the afflictiou of this present
tyme equal to the glore quhilk salbe reuelit in vs.
And
farder thair is na truble quhilk man efter the fall of
Adam may sustine bot his syn hes deseruit the same
and rather mair, sua that the sanctis ar scarcelie suffi∣
•ient
or abîll to dispone thame selfis that thay may
Page 19
haue participation of that satisfaction quhilk Christ
hes maid.
B.
The gude varkis, and paynis quhilk the
Apostlis, and martyrs haue tholit ar considerit
in ane vay, as meritorious, proceiding from
grace thruch Christ be the operation of the
halie ghaist. And in this respect the Apostlis
and Martyrs hes ressauit glore according to
thair vark is: vtheruyse ve cōsidder the trublis
quhilk thay sustinit, as satisfaction for syn, In
the quhilk respect thair meritis may be ap∣plyit
to vther membris of the kirk,* seing sin∣drie
of thame (as Ieremie quha vas sanctifeit
fra his mothers vambe) sustinit monie maj tē∣poral
paynis in this lyf, nor vas requyrit to
mak satisfaction for ony synnis be thame cō∣mittit.
Syclyk S. Iohne the Baptist, and Innu∣merable
vther martyrs, quha thoillit gret pay∣nis
in thair lyf quhilk vas aluyse vithout gret
syn,* as the halie and pacient Iob in his vexatiō
sayis:
vald god my synnis quhair by I haue de∣seruit
goddis vraith var veyit in ane ballance
vith the calamitie that I suffer, for my truble
in compareson of thame is hauiar as the sand
of the sea.
And insafar as thir paynis and pa∣cient
suffering of aduersite for goddis caus
beīg varkis maist acceptable vnto god, vrocht
be the halie ghaist, thruch the grace of Chri∣stis
satisfaction, can not be in vane, It is ne∣cessar
that thay be applyit to vther membris
of the kirk quha hes mister of the same: sua
that heirby the grace thruch Christ cōmuni∣cat
Page [unnumbered]
vnto the faithful is cōmendit insafar as
be the same that quhilk inlaik is in ane mem∣ber,
may be suppleit be another, for vnto
this do is appertine the communiō of sanctis,
quhairby the gude
• varkis of ane ar prof∣fitable
to vthers, according to the maist ex¦pres
vordis of S. Paull: that zour aboundan∣ce
may snpplie thair indigence,
* and thair abo∣undance
may supplie zour pouertie
• as he vald
say, euin as ze be zour riches do supplie thair
pouartie in vardlie guddis, sua thay quha ar¦rache
in gude va
•kis may supplie zour pouar∣tie
thairin, sua that according to the maist
expres vord of God, ve sould navyis doubt,
bot that the paneful induring of the martyrs
and vther halie men may be applyit vnto vs,
and fulfill that quhilk inlakis of our satisfac¦tion.
For euin as the Eey dois se not onlie to
the self bot the hail body as it is ane member
of the same, sua as ve ar all mēbers of the ki
•k,
the varkis of euerie ane, ar proff
•able to vt∣hers.
As to zour last obiection, I maruel gret¦tumlie
hou ze ar sa forzetfull of zour self as to
admit manifest cōrradiction, for at sum tyme
ze deny altogither that efter the syn is re∣mittit,
thair be ony temporal payne quhilk
sould be sustinit for it, and nou ze affirme
that ve sustine al trublis and pane for the O∣riginal
syn, quhilk ve contract of Adam. I
ansuer thaifore, that seing be baptisme, thruch
the merit of Christ al our synnis ar allurerlie
aboleist, sua that be the iustice of god, ve
Page 20
ar obleist to na satisfaction for the same,
and verie monie sustinis gretar pane tem∣poral,
nor thair synnis deseruit efter grace
ressauit in Baptisme, as is manifest in the
halie martirs quha for confession of the na∣me
of Christ sufferit al kynd of tormentis
that could be deuysit be infidel Princis: heirof
it is euideut that thair paneful induring of
troubillis may be applyit to supplie the
satisfactione of vtheris.