A confutation of the Popes bull which was published more then two yeres agoe against Elizabeth the most gracious Queene of England, Fraunce, and Ireland, and against the noble realme of England together with a defence of the sayd true Christian Queene, and of the whole realme of England. By Henry Bullinger the Elder.

About this Item

Title
A confutation of the Popes bull which was published more then two yeres agoe against Elizabeth the most gracious Queene of England, Fraunce, and Ireland, and against the noble realme of England together with a defence of the sayd true Christian Queene, and of the whole realme of England. By Henry Bullinger the Elder.
Author
Bullinger, Heinrich, 1504-1575.
Publication
London :: Printed by Iohn Day dwelling ouer Aldersgate,
An. 1572. Cum priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis per decennium.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Catholic Church. -- Pope (1566-1572 : Pius V). -- Regnans in excelsis -- Controversial literature.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A17167.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A confutation of the Popes bull which was published more then two yeres agoe against Elizabeth the most gracious Queene of England, Fraunce, and Ireland, and against the noble realme of England together with a defence of the sayd true Christian Queene, and of the whole realme of England. By Henry Bullinger the Elder." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A17167.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

¶Also that the latter Byshops of Rome vntill Gregorie the first, vaunted not of any ful∣nesse of power, nor of their supremacie ouer be∣yng aduaunced aboue kinges and kingdomes.

NEuerthelesse we must néedes graunt, that from the tyme of Constantine the great, who did set the Churches in peace, not onely the Bishops of Rome, but also the Bishops of other Churches through the worlde began to step aside from the playne footesteppes of their predecessors, and claue not so carefully to the simple doctrine of the Apostles, and therfore admitted mo ceremo∣nies

Page [unnumbered]

into the Church, then beséemed, and furthermore in∣termeddled them selues in worldly affaires and applyed them selues to much vnto them, yea & inuēted new names and offices of dignitie, and brought such other thinges of the same sort into the Church, which made way for worser thinges. This saw that famous Poet Baptista Mātuanus, who intreatyng of the times of Constantine the great a∣mong other thinges wrate thus.

Most noysom poyson sprang of honny sweete. A right faire word is Rest, a pleasaunt name is peace. But yet from peace shall flowe more losse, Dishonour, shame, reproche and miserie, Then could from cruell warre. For out of kynde the auncient vertue shall degenerate &c.

But howsoeuer the Bishops as well of Rome as of o∣ther Churches began to grow worse and worse, yet were they still ignorant of that Romish Monarchie or rather ty¦rannie which is defended at this day. For that I may al∣ledge nothing hether out of the aunciēter writers of Gods Church: doth not S. Hierome in his Epistle to Euagrius, and in his Commentaries vpon S. Paules Epistle to Ti∣tus, most manisfestly make the Bishop of Rome and the ve∣ry Church of Rome it selfe, equall with all other Byshops and Chuches in the world? Doth he not openly say, that the Churches in old time were gouerned by the common aduise of the elders? Doth he not most piththely shew out of the Scriptures, that elders and bishops be all one thing? and that the one is not the name of age and the other of of∣fice? Doth he not playnly say that Bishops were preferred before elders, & elders made subiect to Bishops, by custome of the Church and not by appointment of God? Wherfore it were truly a wonder, why Epiphanius agaynst the Ar∣rians should recken vp this thing for an heresie, which Ie∣rome vrgeth with so many and so piththy wordes: but that

Page 34

others giue me warnyng that Epiphanius was to gentle in charging other folkes with heresie. Truly in this case (to speake with reuerence of so great a learned mā) he wrong∣fully misreported the giltlesse, contrarie without authori∣tie of the holy Scripture. But if any man list to heare Ie∣romes owne wordes, behold I will briefly rehearse the thinges that make to this purpose. We must not (sayth he to Euagrius) esteme the Church of Rome to be one, & the Church of the whole world to be another. Both Fraunce, and Britaine, and Affrike, and Persia, and the Eastcoun∣treys, and Inde, and all the barbarous natiōs, worshyp one Christ, & obserue one rule of truth. If authoritie be sought, the world is greater than a Citie. Where soeuer is a By∣shop, whether he be of Rome, or of Eugubie, or of Alexan∣drie, or of Tanais, he is all one in merite, all one in Priest∣hode. The statelinesse of riches or the basenesse of pouertie maketh not a Bishop either higher or lower? but all of them are successors of the Apostles.

And vpon the Epistle of S. Paul vnto Titus: An El∣der (sayth he) and a Byshop are both one. And before such tyme as by the instinct of the deuill there were sectes in re∣ligion, and it was sayd among folke, I hold of Paule, I of Apollo, and I of Cephas: the Churches were gouerned by the common aduise of the Elders. But after the time that euery man imagined those whom he had baptised to be his owne and not Christes: it was decréed through the whole world▪ that one (he speaketh not of the bishop of Rome one∣ly, but of all other Metropolitanes through the whole world) should be chosen from among the Elders, and set o∣uer the rest, vnto whom the charge of the whole Church should belong, and so the séedes of schismes and variances be taken away. Againe when the same Ierome had proued and shewed by many textes of Scripture, that Elders and Byshops are all one thing he addeth byanby: I haue ther∣fore mencioned these thinges, that I might shew how El∣ders and Bishops were all one thing, and that for the pluc∣king

Page [unnumbered]

vp of the plantes of dissention, the charge of all things was by little put vnto one. Therfore like as Priests know that by the custome of the Church they be subiect to him that is set ouer them: so also let the Bishops vnderstand that they be greater than the Priestes rather by custome than by truth of Christes ordinaūce, and that they ought to gouerne the Church in common. And so forth.

And although I thinke not that any man will looke for plainer & fuller matter in this present case than this which I haue rehearsed already out of Ierome: yet will I adde somewhat more out of Gregorie, who was himselfe a Bi∣shop of Rome, placed in that sea the yeare of our Lord. 591. in which he dyed the yeare of our Lord 64. He alone wilbe a sufficient able witnesse, that in his time the sayd tyranni∣call and Popish Monarchie was not yet either placed in that sea, nor graūted to it. Before this Gregorie was cho∣sen to the Byshoprik of Rome, he was Pretor or Maior of the Citie of Rome, as he himselfe witnesseth in his booke of Epistles the second Epistle. Beyng chosen Byshop & con∣firmed in his Bishoprike or sea by the Emperour Morice who kept his residence at Constantinople: he calleth him Emperour & acknowledgeth him to be his souerein Lord ordeined by God, and himselfe to be his subiect & seruaunt. Yea and he faithfully obeyed his Exarkes and Captaines that were placed through Italie, calling them his Lordes. He obeyed their lawes, yea and their Ecclesiasticall lawes to. All which thinges are to be read in his Epistles, Lib. 2. Epist. 61. Againe, Lib. 4. Epist. 31. & Lib. 1. Epist. 43. Also, Lib. 7. Epist. 11. Besides this Paulus Diaconus in his 4. booke & 9. chap. of the doyngs of the Lombardes, witnesseth that Gregorie submitted himselfe to be iudged by ye Empe¦rour Maurice, for ye murther of Malchus a byshop, wherof he was appeached. And Gregorie him selfe maketh men∣tiō of the same matter in the seuenth booke of his Epistles.

But these thinges will séeme light and small, if they be compared with those which he himselfe hath left in wri∣tyng.

Page 35

For when as one Iohn Bishop of Constantinople would néedes be called oeconomicall Bishop and be ac∣knowledged for vniuersall Bishop to haue supremacie, iu∣risdiction, and dominion ouer all Churches and Byshops of Churches in the whole world: Gregorie withstode him sharpely and stoutly, like as Bishop Pelagius had done a∣fore him. He wrate many and sundry Epistles concernyng that matter to Maurice the Emperour, to Constance the Empresse, to Iohn himselfe the Bishop of Constantinople, and to the Bishops of Antioche and Alexandria. Among o∣ther thinges he denieth that any man ought to be an vni∣uersall Bishop sauing Christ, & that any Bishops vsurped that title afore him. For he sayth, that the title is, straunge, foolish, proude, péeuish, wicked, and heathenish, wherunto to consent, were euen as much as to renounce the fayth. A∣gayne speakyng of Iohn of Constantinople, Out of the same dust (sayth he) in which he sate, and out of the same lowlynesse which he pretended, he hath taken presumptu∣ousnesse, so as he assayeth to ascribe all thinges to himselfe, and by haultinesse of stately spéech indeuereth to subdue all Christes members to himselfe, which cleaue alonely to their owne head, that is to say, to the same Christ. Anon after comparing with Lucifer, he writeth: Lucifer sayd, I will clymb into heauen, I will exalt my throne aboue the starres of the skie. For what els are all thy brethren the Byshops of the vniuersall Church, but starres of heauen? whose life together with their toung shineth among mens sinnes & errours, as it were in the dareknesse of the night. Before whom when thou couetest to preferre thy selfe by title of preheminence, and to treade their name vnder foote in comparison of thine owne, what els sayest thou, but I will clymb vp into heauen &c. Finally writing to the same Iohn Byshop of Constantinople, all thinges (sayth he) that were forespoken, do come to passe. The kyng of pride is néere at hand, and (which is a shame to be spoken) there is an army of Priestes in preparing for him. For they which

Page [unnumbered]

were set to be lodesmen of lowlynesse serue as souldiers vnder the necke of loftinesse. And the same man agayne in his 6. booke of Epistles and the xxx. Epist. But I say boldly, that who soeuer termeth himselfe or desireth to be termed the vniuersall Bishop, is in his pride the forerunner of An∣tichrist, bycause he preferreth himselfe by his proudnesse before the residue, and by like pryde is led into errour. And certes Gregorie hath spoken these thynges most truly. For the sayd Iohn Bishop of Constantinople was the ve∣ry forerunner of Antichrist, as who by his wicked and im∣portunate demaund of highest preheminence, gaue occa∣sion to the Byshops of Rome to aspire to the top of supre∣macie. Among them after the death of Gregorie, Boni∣face the third obteyned of the Emperour Phocas that he should proclaime the Church of Rome to the head of all o∣ther Churches, as Bede sayth: to be the first Church, as Paulus Diaconus sayth: or to be the mother Church, as Vrspergensis and Crantzius say. Whereupon the Bishops of Rome as beyng Byshops of the souerein Sa, imme∣diatly proclaymed themselues both souerein and vniuer∣sall Shepheardes of all Churches, to whom all ought of dewtie to obey. For the Emperour Phocas (sayth Naucle∣rus in his hystorie) by the Byshop of Romes persuasion sent abroad proclamations openly and to the whole world, ordeinyng that all the Churches of the world should obey the Church and Byshop of Rome. The same History wri∣ter addeth further that in tymes forepast, the same procla∣mation was not obserued in all pointes, and specially not of the Greekes &c. The sayd Phocas that made this law was a monster of mankynd, a most vnthrifty Prince, a most cruell murtherer, a thrall of lecherie, and all wicked∣nesse as histories beare witnesse, and of all kynges the wretcheddest. Therfore least the pot might not haue a co∣••••••••fit for it, or least like lippes might not alwayes finde lyke lettice, he made a constitution euen méete for hym selfe.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.