The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Of Disputation: and how manifolde it is.

DIsputation is a contention about some questi∣on taken in hand, either for finding out of truth, or else for exercise sake, and there bee foure kindes of disputation, whereof the first is called doctrinall, because it appertay∣neth to Science.

The second is called Dialecticall, which belongeth to proba∣ble opinion.

The third is called Tentatiue, which serueth to trie another mans knowledge, in any kinde of Science.

The fourth is called Sophisticall, which tendeth onely to deceiue.

Giue examples of all these foure kindes?

The Doctrinal Disputation vseth no other but Syllogismes Demonstratiue as this is, whatsoeuer hath reason, is capable of learning; but Iohn hath reason: Ergo, Iohn is capable of lear∣ning. Dialecticall Disputation vseth onely probable Syllo∣gismes, as the former example of Medea, euery mother loueth her child; but Medea is a mother: Ergo, Medea loueth her childe: against this another probable argument may be made thus: whosoeuer killeth her child, loueth not her childe: but Medea killed her child: Ergo, she loued not her child. Tenta∣tiue disputation vseth such arguments as are made of the first common principles of any science, in which principles who so is ignorant, cannot be skilful in that Science; as if a man would professe Geometrie, and know not the definitions of a point, or pricke of a line, or superficies, or of such common Maxims, as these are; the whole is more then his part: take equall from equall, and equall remaine, &c. should quickly bewray his owne ignorance.

Sophisticall disputation vseth nothing but decei•…•…full argu∣ments, or Fallaxes, whereof there be thirteene kindes hereafter set downe: but first I will shew you which be the fiue Markes and Ends of Sophistrie.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.