The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title: The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author: Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication: London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,; 1617.
Rights/Permissions: To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms: Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item: "The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Giue example.

Whoso killeth any Ambassadours in their iourneying, doth violate the Lawes of Armes: but the Frenchmen kil∣led our Ambassadour iourneying to Spaine: Ergo, the French∣men in so doing did violate the Lawes of Armes: Here to the Maior a man may answere by instance, thus: the Athe∣nians killed the Ambassadours of the Lacedemonians iour∣neying to the Kings of Persia, because they went to pro∣cure his aide, to destroy the Citie of Athens: So likewise the Romanes did intercept the Legates of Hanibal going to the King of the Macedonians for the like intent; and yet nei∣ther of these people did thinke to breake the Lawes of Armes, by doing that which should preserue their State and Com∣mon-weale.