The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Which be the speciall Rules belonging to the three Figures?

In the first foure Moods of the first Figure directly conclu∣ding the Minor, may not be a Negatiue, nor the Maior parti∣cular, but vniuersall.

In the second Figure, the Maior must not bee particular,

Page 143

and one of the premisses must bee a Negatiue.

In the third Figure, the Minor must not be a Negatiue, nor the conclusion vniuersall: but as for the quantitie and qualitie of euery Proposition in euery kinde of Syllogisme, of what Figure soeuer it be, it shall plainly appeare by the Vowels, or rather Syllables of the Moods, otherwise called words of Art, annexed to the examples hereafter following.

First giue examples of Syllogismes of the first Figure, and of his foure perfect Moods directly concluding.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.