The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
About this Item
Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.
Pages
Of Enumeration.
WHat is Enumeration?
Enumeration is a kinde of Argument, wher∣in many things being reckoned vp and denied, one thing onely of necessitie remaineth to bee affirmed, as thus: Sith thou hast this Horse, ey∣ther thou didst buy him, or he came to thee by inheritance, or hee was giuen thee, or bred at home with thee, or else thou didst take him from thine enemie in time of warre; or if none of these were, then thou must needs steale him: but thou ney∣ther boughtest him, nor he fell not vnto thee by inheritance,
nor was giuen thee, •…•…or bred vp at home with thee, nor yet taken by thee from the enemie: it followeth therefore of neces∣sitie that thou hast stolne him.
When is this kind of argument to be confuted?
When your aduersary can prooue any necessary part to bee left out.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.