The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

How manifold is the office of a Logicall difference?

Twofold: the one to diuide the generall kinde into his especi∣all kindes, and the other to constitute or make the selfe-same spe∣ciall kindes. Wherfore such differences are said in diuers respects to be sometimes diuisiue, and sometimes constitutiue, yea and sometimes both; as these differences, corporate and vncorpo∣rate, liuing and vnliuing, sensible and vnsensible, reasonable and vnreasonable; which in that they doe diuide some generall kinde into other kindes, either more speciall, or not so generall, they may be called differences diuisiue: but in that they constitute or make any speciall kinde, as this difference reasonable being ad∣ded to a sensible body, maketh the speciall kinde, man; such dif∣ference may be well called a difference constitutiue, or rather spe∣cificatiue, as the former Table of generall kindes and differences doth plainly shew.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.