ANNOTATIONS CHAP. III.
16. Certaine things hard.]* 1.1 This is a plaine text to conuince the Protestants, vvho (as al heretikes lightly doe and did from the beginning) say the Scriptures be easie to vnder∣stand, and therfore may be not onely read safely, but also expounded boldly of al the people, as vvel vnlearned as learned: and consequently euery one by him self and his pri∣uate spirit, vvithout respect of the expositions of the learned fathers, or expectation of the Churches, their Pastors and Prelates iudgment, may determine and make choise of such sense as him self liketh or thinketh agreable. For this is partly their saying, partly the necessarie sequele of their folish opinion, vvhich admitteth nothing but the bare Scriptures. And Luther said that the Scriptures vvere more plaine then al the fathers commentaries: and so al to be superfluous but the Bible. Pra••fat. assert. art. damnat.
Against al vvhich Diuelish & seditious arrogācie, tending to make the people esteeme them selues learned or sufficient vvithout their Pastors and spiritual rulers helpe, to guide them selues in al matters of doctrine & doubtes in religion:* 1.2 the holy Apostle here telleth and forevvarneth the faithful, that the Scriptures be ful of difficultie, & specially S. Paules epistles of al other partes of holy vvrite, and that ignorant men ••ad vnstable or phātastical fellovves puffed to & fro vvith euery blast of doctrine and haeresie, abuse, peruert, and misconster them to their ovvne damnation. And* 1.3 S. Augustine saith, that the special difficulty in S. Paules epistles, vvhich ignorant, and euil men do so peruert and vvhich S. Peter meaneth, is his hard speache and much commendation of that faith vvhich he saith doth iustifie. vvhich the ignorant euen from the Apostles time, and much more novv, haue and do so misconster, as though he had meant that onely faith vvithout good vvorkes could iustifie or saue a man. Against vvhich vvicked collection and abuse of S. Paules vvordes, the said father faith, al these Canonical or Catholike epistles vvere vvritten.
But the Haeretikes here to shift of the matter, and to creepe out after their fashion, ansvver,* 1.4 that S. Peter saith not, S. Paules epistles be hard, but that many things in them are hard. Vvhich may be to the Catholikes an example of their sophistical euasions from the euidence of Gods vvord. As though it vvere not al one to say, Such an author or vvriter is hard: and, There be many things in that vvriter hard to be vnderstood. For, vvhether it be that the argument and matter be high and past vulgar capacitie, as that of praedestination, reproba∣tion, vocation of the Gentiles, and iustifying faith: or vvhether his manner of stile and vvriting be obscure: al proue that his epistles be hard, and other Scriptures also: because