fond gloses for ansvver of so plaine places, be as impudent as the denying of the Epistle vvas in the other. vvho vvould neuer haue denied the booke, thereby to shevv them selues Heretikes, if they had thought those vulgar euasions that the Zuinglians and Caluinists do vse (vvhereof they vvere not ignorant) could haue serued. In both sortes the Christian Reader may see, that al the Heretikes vaunting of expresse Scriptures & the vvord of God, is no more but to delude the vvorld. vvhereas in deede, be the Scriptures neuer so plaine against them, they must either be vvrested to sound as they say, or els they must be no Scriptures at all. And to see Luther, Caluin, Beza, & their fellovves, sitte as it vvere in iudgement of the Scriptures, to allovv or disallovv at their pleasures, it is the most notorious example of Heretical pride & miserie that can be. See their prefaces and censures vpon this Canonical Epistle, the Apocalypse, the Machabees, and other.
21. Abraham vvas he not iustified by vvorkes?] It is much to be noted that S. Augustine in his booke de fide & operibus c. 14. vvriteth, that the heresie of onely faith iustifying or sauing, vvas an old Heresie euen in the Apostles time, gathered by the false interpretation of some of S. Paules pro∣found disputation in the Epistle to the Romans, vvherein he commended so highly the faith in Christ, that they thought good vvorkes vvere not auilable: adding further, that the other three Apostles, Iames, Iohn, and Iude, did of purpose vvrite so much of good vvorkes, to correct the said errour of onely faith, gathered by the misconstruction of S. Paules vvordes. Yea vvhen S. Peter (Ep. 2 c. 3.) vvarneth the faithful that many things be hard in S. Paules vvritings, and of light vnlearned men mistaken to their perdition: the said S. Augustine affirmeth, that he meant of his disputation concerning faith, vvhich so many Heretikes did mistake to condemne good vvorkes. And in the preface of his commentarie vpon the 31 Psalme, he vvarneth al men, that this deduction vpon S. Paules speache, Abraham vvas iustified by faith, therfore vvorkes be not necessarie to saluation: is the right vvay to the gulfe of Hel and damnation.
And lastly (vvhich is in it self very plaine) that vve may see this Apostle did purposely thus commend vnto vs the necessitie of good vvorkes, and the inanity aud insufficiencie of onely faith, to correct the errour of such as misconstrued S. Paules vvordes for the same the said holy Doctor noteth that of purpose he tooke the very same example of Abraham, vvhom S. Paul said to be iusti∣fied by faith, and declareth that he vvas iustified by good vvorkes, specifying the good vvorke for vvhich he vvas iustified and blessed of God, to vvitte, his obedience and immolation of his onely sonne. But hovv S. Paul saith that Abraham vvas iustified by faith, see the Annotations vpon that place. Ro. 4. v. 1.
22. Faith did vvorke vvith.] Some Heretikes hold, that good vvorkes are pernicious to saluation and iustification: other, that though they be not hurtful but required, yet they be no causes or vvorkers of saluation, much lesse meritorious, but are as effectes and fruites issuing necessarily out of faith. Both vvhich fictions, falshods, and flightes from the plaine truth of Gods vvord, are refuted by these vvordes, vvhen the Apostle saith, That faith vvorketh together vvith good vvorkes: making faith to be a coadiutor or cooperator vvith vvorkes, and so both ioyntly concurring as causes and vvorkers of iu∣stification: yea aftervvard he maketh vvorkes the more principal cause, vvhen he resem∣bleth faith to the body, and vvorkes to the spirit or life of man.
23. The frend of God.] By this also an other false and friuolous euasion of the Here∣tikes is ouertaken, vvhen they feine, that the Apostle here vvhen he saith, vvorkes do iustifie, meaneth that they shew vs iust before men, and auaile not to our iustice before God. For the Apostle euidently declareth that Abraham by his vvorkes vvas made or truely called the freend of God, and therfore vvas not (as the Heretikes say) by his vvorkes approued iust before man onely.
24. Not by faith onely.] This proposition or speache is directly opposite or contradi∣ctorie to that vvhich the Heretikes hold. For the Apostle saith, Man is iustified by good workes, and not by faith only. but the Heretikes say, Man is not iustified by good vvorkes, but by faith only. Neither can they pretend that there is the like contradiction or con∣trarietie betwixt S. Iames speache and S. Paules. for though S. Paul say, man is iustified by faith, yet he neuer saith, by faith onely, nor euer meaneth by that faith vvhich is alone, but alvvaies by that faith vvhich vvorketh by charitie, as he expoundeth him self. Though concerning vvorkes also, there is a difference betwixt the first iustification, vvhereof S. Paul specially speaketh: and the second iustification, vvhereof S. Iames doth more specially treate. Of vvhich thing els vvhere there is ynough said.
The fathers in deede vse sometimes this exclusiue, sola, onely: but in far other sense then the Protestants. For some of them thereby exclude only the vvorkes of Moyses law, against the Iewes: some, the vvorkes of nature and moral vertues vvithout the grace or knowledge of Christ, against the Gentiles: some, the necessitie of external good vvorkes vvhere the parties lacke time and meanes to doe them, as in the case of the penitent theefe: some, the false opinions, sectes, and religions contrarie to the Catholike faith, against He∣retikes and miscreants: some exclude reason, sense, and arguing in matters of faith and mysterie, against such as vvil beleeue nothing but that they see or vnderstand: some, the