preuaricátour of the Lavv, thy circumcision is become pre∣puce. ✝ [leftJustify 26] If then the prepuce ″ keepe the iustices of the Lavv: shal not his prepuce be reputed for circumcision? ✝ [leftJustify 27] and shal not that vvhich of nature is prepuce, fulfilling the Lavv, iudge thee, that by the letter and circumcision art a preuaricátour of the Lavv? ✝ [leftJustify 28] For not he that is in open shevv, is a Ievv, not that vvhich is in open shevv, in the flesh, is circumcision: ✝ [leftJustify 29] but he that is in secrete, is a Ievv: and the circumcision of the hart, ″ in spirit, not in the letter: vvhose praise is not of men, but of God.
ANNOTATIONS CHAP. II.
1. Thou that iudgest.) Such as by publike authoritie either spiritual or temporal haue to punish offenders, be not forbidden to iudge or condemne any for their offenses, though them selues be sometimes guilty in their conscience of the same or greater: yet may it be matter of aggrauating sinnes before God, vvhen they vvil not repent of those offenses them selues, for the vvhich they punish others. but if they be open offenders them selues, in the same sort for vvhich they iudge other, they giue scandal, and thereby aggrauate their sinnes very much. Proprely here he forbiddeth to charge an other falsely or truely vvith these crimes vvhereof him self is as farre guilty or more then the other, as the Ievves specially did the Gentils, to vvhom he speaketh here.
4. Doest thou contemne?) This proueth that God offereth his grace and mercie to many, and by long patience and sufferance expecteth their repētance, differring their punishment of purpose that they may amend, and that he is not delighted in their perdition, nor is the cause of their sinne: but contrarievvise that they harden their ovvne hartes, and of their ovvne free vvil relect his grace and contemne his benignitie.
6. According to his vvorkes.) Though the holy Apostles special purpose be in this Epistle, to commend vnto the Gentiles that trusted so much in their moral vvorkes, the faith in Christ: yet lest any man should thinke or gather vntruely of his vvordes, that Christian mens vvorkes vvere not meritorious or the cause of Saluation, he expresly vvriteth, that God giueth as vvel euerlasting life and glorie to men, for and according to their good vvorkes, as he giueth damnation for the contrarie vvorkes. And hovv so euer Heretikes fondly flee from the euidence of these places, yet S. Augustine saith, Life euerlasting to be rendered for good vvorkes according to this manifest Scripture, God shal render to euery man according to his vvorkes.
13. Not the hearers.) This same sentence agreable also to Christes vvordes (Mat. ••, 21▪) is the very ground of S. Iames disputation, that not faith alone, but good vvorkes also do iustifie. Ther∣fore S. Paul (hovvsoeuer some peruersly conster his vvordes in other place) meaneth the same that S. Iames. And here * he speaketh not properly of the first iustification, vvhen an Infidel or il man is made iust, vvho had no acceptable vvorkes before to be iustified by (of vvhich kind he spe∣cially meaneth in other places of this Epistle) but he speaketh of the second iustification or increase of former iustice, vvhich he that is in Gods grace, daily procedeth in, by doing al kind of good vvorkes, vvhich be iustices, and for doing of vvhich, he is iust in deede before God. and of this kinde doth S. Iames namely treate. Vvhich is directly against the Heretikes of this time, vvho not only attribute nothing to the vvorkes done in sinne and infidelitie, but esteeme nothing at al of al Christian mens vvorkes tovvard iustification and saluation, condemning them as vncleane, sinful, hy pocritical, Pharisaical: vvhich is directly against these & other Scripture, and plaine blaspheming of Christ and his grace, by vvhose spirit and cooperation vve doe them.
13. Shal be iustified.) Of al other Articles deceitfully handled by Heretikes, they vse most guile in this of Iustification: and specially by the equiuocation of certaine vvordes, vvhich is proper to al contentious vvranglers, and namely in this vvord, Iustifie, Vvhich because they finde sometime to signifie the acquiting of a guilty man of some crime vvhere of he is in deede guilty, & for vvhich he ought to be condemned, (as by mans iudgement either of ignorance or of purpose often a very malefactor is deemed or declared and pronounced innocent) they falsly make it so signifie in this place and the like, vvheresoeuer man is said to be iustified of God for his vvorkes or othervvise: as though it vvere said, that God iustifieth man, that is to say, imputeth to him the iustice of Christ,