The answer.
In the former note these decrées you did insinuate to be mat∣ters vnwritten, and now in this note they are articles of our
A view of the marginal notes of the popish Testament, translated into English by the English fugitiue papists resiant at Rhemes in France. By George Wither
About this Item
- Title
- A view of the marginal notes of the popish Testament, translated into English by the English fugitiue papists resiant at Rhemes in France. By George Wither
- Author
- Wither, George, 1540-1605.
- Publication
- Printed at London :: By Edm. Bollifant for Thomas Woodcocke,
- [1588]
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Bible -- N.T -- English -- Versions -- Douai -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Bible. -- N.T -- Commentaries -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15622.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"A view of the marginal notes of the popish Testament, translated into English by the English fugitiue papists resiant at Rhemes in France. By George Wither." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15622.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.
Pages
Page 141
faith, and so consequently some articles of our faith are not writ∣ten. O miserable men! What state are they in whom you lead? When you pull from them the foundation and groundworke of their faith? The authoritie of lawfull councels we reuerence, as much as is lawfull to reuerence men. But by this councel we gather that a councell may be lawfully called, though the bishop of Rome call it not, and that it is not néedful that he or his legate à latere should be president in councels, and that it is not of ne∣cessity requisite, that he should confirme and ratifie councels. For it is manifest that no bishop of Rome bare stroke in this councel.