The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson

About this Item

Title
The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson
Author
Wilson, Thomas, 1525?-1581.
Publication
[Imprinted at London :: By Richard Grafton, printer to the Kynges Maiestie],
An. M.D.LI. [1551]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15542.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15542.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

The maner of reasonyng.

Yf one list to reason from the place, called in latin Locus, he may thus say. Suche a one is in the countrye, Ergo he is not in the Citie. Yf I will proue that a man beynge accused of murder vniustly, did not offend: I may reason both from the time, and the place. The man was killed in the fieldes, aboute iij. of the clocke in the after none, all whiche time this other man came not

Page [unnumbered]

abrode. No, he loked not out of his house all that daye. Ergo this man dyd not kyll hym. Clodius was accused at Ro∣me that he had made a spoyle of the re∣liques in the tēple of Bona Dea, where as he at the same tyme when this dede was thought to be done, was at Inte∣ramna, a village in the countrye beside Rome. Quintilian saith thus. Thou hast killed an adulterer, which the law doth permitte, but bycause thow haste kylled the same mā in a brothels house, thou art worthye to dye thie selfe. Not¦withstandinge these .i. places are ra∣ther vsed of the Rethoriciens, than e∣mong the logiciens, for when a man is taken of suspection we go aboute to proue hym faultie by diuerse coniectu∣res. As if he ware about ye same place, at the self same time, whan a man was slayne, and also had his sworde aboute hym: we coniecture that he might haue killed hym. Againe if we perceiue one to be a riotous felowe, readie to fight with euery bodie, accompanyeng with naughtie packes, and euermore at one end of al frayes, waxyng pale when he is ap∣prehended,

Page [unnumbered]

shakynge for feare, or run∣nyng awaye, when he should be taken, we suspect suche a one that he is not al∣together cliere. Therfore Oratours do vse to marke thinges that go before the facte, as whether he hated the man or no, or what gaine he might haue by his death, and also obserue thynges ioy∣ned with the faulte, as changynge of hewe, when he is apprehended, or his sworde to be blodie, or any parte of his apparell, and thyrdlye thei note what followeth. that is, if he ran awaye, if he cannot tell his tale plainlye, and so they conclude as they are led by suspe∣ction. Some Argumētes are necessary, some probable, as thus, from the conse∣quent. Such a womā is brought in bed with a childe, Ergo she hathe had the compaignie of man. Suche a man had a bluddye sworde in his hande straight after the death of his neyghbour, euen in the same fildes wher his neyghbour was slaine, Ergo it is like this mā hath slayne hym. All which argumentes are deriued from the place called Contin∣gentia as I wyll shewe it hereafter.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.