¶The second rule.
From that, whiche by nature is in any thyng, to that whiche happeth ca∣sually, or cōmeth by some miseuill, the reason is not good. As thus.
Sobre diet is good:
A feuer causeth sobre diet.
Ergo a feuer is good.
Another argument vsed by the Romishe bishop.
Synne doth not beget man.
The worke of lust begetteth man.
Therfore lust otherwise called concupiscentia, is not synne.
The second proposicion is not true, for wicked concupiscence, came in by mannes foly, and hath muche defaced that, which nature first ordeined. Ther¦fore nature it self through god, geueth increase, whiche is muche contrary to the wicked lust of concupiscence.