The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson

About this Item

Title
The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson
Author
Wilson, Thomas, 1525?-1581.
Publication
[Imprinted at London :: By Richard Grafton, printer to the Kynges Maiestie],
An. M.D.LI. [1551]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15542.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe, by Thomas Vuilson." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15542.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

¶An other Example.

Nembroth although he was a iolie

Page [unnumbered]

hūter, yet he liued like a wretche in great miserie.

Laban also liued wretchedly,

Pharao was sore plaged,

Amalech, Madian, Abimelech,

Herode, with other ware scourged greuously for their wickednes, neither is their any example to the contrary,

Therfore the ende of wicked men is wretched.

This kynde of Argument is called Inductio, because that shewing diuer∣se propre names, it enduceth at length, and moueth the mind to make a gene∣rall conclusion. Therfore necessary it is, that in such Argumentes al the ex∣amples which are induced be like, for if any be found contrary, the Argument is of no force, as thus,

Athanasius liued vnmaried,

Ambrosius liued vnmaried,

Basilius had no wife & a great many mo.

Ergo all Bishoppes heretofore were vnmaried.

The Argument is not Lawful, for∣asmuche

Page [unnumbered]

as diuerse haue been maried in the Primatiue Churche, as Spiri∣dion, Hermes, Hilarius, Policrates, Tertullianus, and diuers other. for it was the maner in ye primatiue church that honeste maried men were chosen to be Bishoppes, and had the charge of christes flocke. The Apostles also (as Egnatius wittenesseth) had wiues aswel as other men, and as I think v∣sed them, as other mē do their wiues, or elles asked their leaue, and consent to forbeare them.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.