Page 194
DIAL. IX.
Verse 19.Now we know, that whatsoeuer the Law saith, it saith to them that are vnder the Law, that euery mouth may bee stopped, & all the world subiect to the iudgement of God.
VVHat is the drift of this Text?* 1.1
It is an answere to the secret obiection of the Iewes, which were ready to alledge, that the a∣forenamed Scriptures did not belong vnto them, but vnto some other. Vnto which the Apostle doth answer, that the Law and Doctrine thereof being giuen proper∣ly to the Iewes, whatsoeuer was written in the Law, must needs concerne them, at least principally.
How proued he that the things in the Law, did belong to the Iewes?
By these three Arguments: First, from the refe∣rence which the Law hath to them, to wit, the Iewes, to whom it was giuen. Secondly, from the end, that e∣uery mouth should be stopped. Thirdly, from the testi∣mony of the Conscience, whereas he saith [Wee know:] as who should say, there is none of vs ignorant of this.
What doe we learne from hence?
That besides the light of the word, GOD hath set vp a light in euery mans Conscience, which maketh him see and know what is true and fit to be done, and what is otherwise.
How is the word [Law] taken heere?
Not strictly for the ten Commandements, as Mat. 22, 36. nor yet for the doctrine of saluation, as Ps. 19, 7. but for the whole Scripture of the old Testament, as appeareth by the fore-named sentences, cited out of the Psalmes and Prophets.
What do we learne by this?
That euery sentence of Scripture, hath the force