To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Verse 30.Without vnderstanding, Couenant-breakers, without natu∣rall affection, such as can neuer be appeased, Mercilesse.
WHat do yee meane by those that are vvithout vnderstanding?
Such as haue vnderstanding, and cannot vse it; but deale as men voide of reason and counsell, vnadui∣sedly
and headstrongly, following their passions. These men breake the rule of the word, which chargeth vs to walk wisely. Secondly, they are vnlike vnto God, who doth all his things by wisedome and counsell. Thirdly, they purchase much woe to themselues, thorough their foolish and rash dealing. Fourthly, they disgrace their persons, their actions, and oftentimes their profession through foolishnesse.
What Lesson was then giuen heere?
That wee vndertake nothing without good and due deliberation; Establish thy thoughts by counsell, sayeth Salomon in his Booke of Prouerbes.
Who are these Couenant-breakers?
They who will abide by no Couenants, Leagues, or promises, further then it is to serue their turn. These men they are vnlike to God, who is faithfull in all his promises. Secondly, they shal neuer come into the lords Tabernacle, Psal. 15, 1. Thirdly, they are enemies to hu∣mane society, the band whereof is fidelitie and truth. Fourthly, they bring forth a fruite of the flesh, Gal. 5, 20. and breake the Law in a maine point, Math. 23, 23. vnder these be meant, all which deny things committed to their trust, or deceiue trust put in them.
How many manner of Couenants be there?
Two: Religious and Ciuil. Of ciuil Couenants there be two sorts: First, publicke; for publicke duties in respect of a place. Secondly, for priuate duties in re∣spect of priuate Callings.
How else deuide ye couenants?
Nationall betweene Countries, personall betwixt particular persons.
What do ye call naturall affections?
Such as be amongst them of one bloud and kindred, as betweene parents and children, husbands and wiues, kindred, countrey, heathens, yea Christians also voyde of these.
What doth it differ from humane and Christian affec∣tion?
Humane affection is that whereby wee embrace all men as men: naturall affection is that whereby wee im∣brace them which are neere vnto vs by bloud: Christian affection, is that whereby we loue good men, because they belong to Christ.
Who are they that can neuer be appeased?
Such as being once offended, will neuer bee recon∣ciled againe: also such as can agree with none, nor brook the conditions of others: these men they are contrary to God, who is ready to bee appeased. Secondly, they make God their enimie, who hateth such as are enimies to peace, yea reiecteth all their seruice done to him as abhominable. See Math. 5. 23. 24. 25.
Who are mercilesse men?
Such as cannot pitty any man, but are cruell, fierce, hard-hearted.
What reasons to driue vs from mercilesnes?
First, it is against Gods commandement and nature. Secondly, it maketh men also to bee mercilesse to vs, be∣cause wee cannot pitty them that are in misery; the Hea∣thers were full of cruelties, as also the Turks in their wars, shedding the bloud of men, women and children without all pitty; casting men to beastes, and causing men to kill one another at sword playing.
Concerning the forenamed sins which are 23. in num∣ber, we are generally to obserue these few and short notes. First, that he first setteth downe one worde (vnrighteous∣nesle,) which comprehends them that follow, as kindes and parts of vnrighteousnes. Secondly, that they are here to be considered not simply as sinnes, or causes of sinnes, but as effects and punishments springing from the root of Idolatry. Thirdly, that he nameth not all the branches of iniustice to men, (see more Gal. 5. 19. 20. Col. 2, 8.) but the most principall and such as then reigned most amongst the Heathens. Fourthly, that though an imputation bee here laid vpon al the Heathen, who are vniuersally blamed without exception, because few among them liued ciuilly,
and all were by nature giuen to them; yet no doubt all were not alike guilty; and further howsoeuer all these sins were not found in euery one, yet all were guilty of some one or more of them. Moreouer, he doeth accuse the Ro∣manes directly to bee faulty in these transgressions, but in∣directly framing his speech vnder the persons of others, to decline enuy; letting them rather see in the mirrour of o∣ther mens liues, what themselues were by nature, then plainly charging them to do such things. Lastly, there is a great difference betweene godly Christians and prophane Heathens, in respect of these vices; which howsoeuer Gods regenerate children may fall into some of them, of frailty and by strength of temptation; yet they are not gi∣uen wholy, and for euer ouer vnto any of them, nor bee full fraught with them.