A commentarie vpon the most diuine Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes Containing for matter, the degeneration of our nature by Adams Fall; and the restauration thereof, by the grace of Christ. Together with the perfection of faith, and the imbecillity of workes, in the cause of iustification of elect sinners before God. For forme and maner of handling, it hath the coherence and method, the summe and scope, the interpretations & doctrines the reasons and vses, of most texts. All which, are set downe very familiarly and compendiously, in forme of a dialogue, betweene Tlmotheus [sic] and Silas, by Thomas Wilson, one of the six preachers in the cathedrall church of Canterbury.

About this Item

Title
A commentarie vpon the most diuine Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes Containing for matter, the degeneration of our nature by Adams Fall; and the restauration thereof, by the grace of Christ. Together with the perfection of faith, and the imbecillity of workes, in the cause of iustification of elect sinners before God. For forme and maner of handling, it hath the coherence and method, the summe and scope, the interpretations & doctrines the reasons and vses, of most texts. All which, are set downe very familiarly and compendiously, in forme of a dialogue, betweene Tlmotheus [sic] and Silas, by Thomas Wilson, one of the six preachers in the cathedrall church of Canterbury.
Author
Wilson, Thomas, 1563-1622.
Publication
London :: Printed by W. Iaggard, dwelling in Barbican,
1614.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Bible. -- N.T. -- Romans -- Commentaries -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15525.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A commentarie vpon the most diuine Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes Containing for matter, the degeneration of our nature by Adams Fall; and the restauration thereof, by the grace of Christ. Together with the perfection of faith, and the imbecillity of workes, in the cause of iustification of elect sinners before God. For forme and maner of handling, it hath the coherence and method, the summe and scope, the interpretations & doctrines the reasons and vses, of most texts. All which, are set downe very familiarly and compendiously, in forme of a dialogue, betweene Tlmotheus [sic] and Silas, by Thomas Wilson, one of the six preachers in the cathedrall church of Canterbury." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15525.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2024.

Pages

DIAL. XIIII.
Verse 25.

Which turned the truth of God into a lye, and worshipped the Creature, for saking the Creator, who is to be blessed for e∣uer, Amen.

Tim.

WHat is the Apostles method heere, how doth he proceede in this matter?

Silas.

As before in 23, 24, so now againe he openeth the Fountaine of that impurity in defiling themselues, and Iniustice toward their Neighbour, to wit; their im∣piety toward God, and prophanation of his worshippe,

Page 81

which was the very Root and Mother of such abomina∣ble Children and branches, as filthy lusts and vniust acti∣ons be: that which he called the changing of his glory, in verse 23, now he tearmeth the turning of his truth, that is, those true principles touching Gods eternall power and God-head, engrafted in their mindes; and that which before he named the Image or likenesse of a corruptible man, is heere named (falsity or a lye) be∣cause it represents him falsly, and ascribeth to him a ly∣ing kind of worship: for God will not be eyther pour∣traied by an Image, or serued in an Image, or by or be∣fore one. All such worship howsoeuer it be by Idola∣ters intended and directed vnto God, yet it is not so ac∣cepted of God, neither indeed is it giuen to him at all, but vnto Idols, as Paul teacheth, 1. Cor. 10, 19, 20. therefore it is better translated (they serued the Crea∣ture) passing by, or forsaking the Creator; then thus (more then the Creator) but if we reade it more or ra∣ther) then it is like to that in Iohn 3, 19. and Luke 10, 14. thus ye haue both the connexion of this Text with the former, and the interpretation of the phrases therein in some part.

Tim.

What is the drift of this Verse, at what marke dooth it ayme?

First to proue (as hee did before, verse 23.) that the Gentiles, howsoeuer they knewe the Law of Nature, touching the worship of the true God, yet did violate and transgresse it by their grosse Idolatry. Secondly, to lay out the Iustice of God, in bringing vpon them, that heauy punishment, mentioned verse 24. whereof their grosse Idolatry was the true and proper cause.

Tim.

Tell vs now what is the sum of this Verse?

Silas.

It is a liuely description of Idolatry, which is a changing of the true God into a lye, and worshipping of the Creature, to the contempt of the Creator.

Tim.

What is meant by the truth of God?

Sil.

The God who is true, as before, verse 20. the

Page 82

glorie of God, being put for the God who is ful of glo∣rie and Maiesty: so heere the [Truth of God] is put for the most true God, and such true notions as men haue naturally in them concerning the nature of God.

Tim.

How is the true God defaced by an Image made of him?

Silas.

First, because when God is represented by an Image, something is attributed and giuen to him, which he is not; as that he should be visible, finite, incompre∣hensible, mortall, corruptible, earthly. Secondly, that is denied him, and taken away from him, which in trueth is his owne, namely; his eternity, immensity, inuisible∣nesse, immortality. So euery Image of God, is a false and lying representation.

Tim.

Wherefore is an Image called a Lye by our Apo∣stle?

Sil.

First, because from Idolles was taken away that which they were, for they were no more counted wood and stone, though in truth they still were so. Secondly, that was yeilded to them by Idolators, which they were not; as namely, the likenesse of God, to wit; of the po∣wer and nature of God.

Tim.

What do ye further note in this Verse?

Silas.

That there be two degrees of Idolatry. First, to make Images of the Deity. Secondly, to serue and giue them worship, by outward gestures of kneeling, lifting vp hands, praying before them, offering Incense, &c.

Tim.

When it is said [they worshipped the Creature aboue the Creator] is it meant they worshipped both Images & God, but Images more then God?

Sil.

No, they did not somuch as giue the second place to God, but wholly neglected him, being whollie ad∣dicted to the worship of the Creature.

Tim.

Is this true in all Idolaters which worship Images?

Silas.

It is so: for whatsoeuer they pretend, yet God is not worshipped at all, where he is not worshipped a∣right and alone: therefore, is Idoll-seruice tearmed in

Page 83

Deut. 22, 17. and 1. Cor. 19. Diuell-seruice.

Tim.

What learne we from the end of the sentence, where∣in he saith of God, he is to be praised for euer?

Sil.

Thus much, that Idolaters haue no good successe of their enterprise with their practise: for, howsoeuer they seeke to rob God of his glorie, and to change his truth for a lye, yet he remaines God, to bee praised and blessed for euer: for all that men can do, is not able to alter Gods glorie or truth, he abideth alwaies one and the same, like himselfe, God, woorthy to be blessed for euer. Rom. 9, 5.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.