Hexapla in Danielem: that is, A six-fold commentarie vpon the most diuine prophesie of Daniel wherein according to the method propounded in Hexapla vpon Genesis and Exodus, sixe things are obserued in euery chapter. 1. The argument and method. 2. The diuers readings. 3. The questions discussed. 4. Doctrines noted. 5. Controversies handled. 6. Morall observations applyed. Wherein many obscure visions, and diuine prophesies are opened, and difficult questions handled with great breuitie, perspicuitie, and varietie ... and the best interpreters both old and new are therein abridged. Diuided into two bookes ... By Andrevv Willet Professour of Diuinitie. The first booke.

About this Item

Title
Hexapla in Danielem: that is, A six-fold commentarie vpon the most diuine prophesie of Daniel wherein according to the method propounded in Hexapla vpon Genesis and Exodus, sixe things are obserued in euery chapter. 1. The argument and method. 2. The diuers readings. 3. The questions discussed. 4. Doctrines noted. 5. Controversies handled. 6. Morall observations applyed. Wherein many obscure visions, and diuine prophesies are opened, and difficult questions handled with great breuitie, perspicuitie, and varietie ... and the best interpreters both old and new are therein abridged. Diuided into two bookes ... By Andrevv Willet Professour of Diuinitie. The first booke.
Author
Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621.
Publication
[Cambridge] :: Printed by Cantrell Legge, printer to the Vniuersitie of Cambridge,
1610.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Bible. -- O.T. -- Daniel -- Commentaries -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15415.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Hexapla in Danielem: that is, A six-fold commentarie vpon the most diuine prophesie of Daniel wherein according to the method propounded in Hexapla vpon Genesis and Exodus, sixe things are obserued in euery chapter. 1. The argument and method. 2. The diuers readings. 3. The questions discussed. 4. Doctrines noted. 5. Controversies handled. 6. Morall observations applyed. Wherein many obscure visions, and diuine prophesies are opened, and difficult questions handled with great breuitie, perspicuitie, and varietie ... and the best interpreters both old and new are therein abridged. Diuided into two bookes ... By Andrevv Willet Professour of Diuinitie. The first booke." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15415.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

Quest. 57. That this kingdome which God shall raise vp must be vnderstood of the kingdome of Christ.

Vers. 44. The God of heauen shall set vp a kingdome. Caluin here setteth downe cer∣taine reasons, out of the Rabbine Barbinel whereby he would prooue, that this kingdome cannot be referred to Iesus the sonne of Mary: his reasons are these six in all.

1. Seeing these foure kingdomes here described are terrene and visible, the fift also which should destroy the other must be also visible, for vnlike things cannot be compared together.

Contra. 1. It is not necessarie, that all things should be like in a comparison: nay here is rather an opposition betweene the 4. kingdomes, and this fifth, then a comparison, and in that it is to destroy the rest, it must be vnlike vnto the rest: the Rabbines argument therefore followeth not; The fift kingdome shall destroy the former foure, Ergo it shall be of the same kind with the rest: the contrarie is better inferred, that therefore it shall be vnlike vnto the rest.

2. Ar. If religion made a difference between these kingdomes, then were they not foure but one: for all of them were giuen to idolatrie, and so followed the same superstition.

Contra. 1. It is necessarie that the 5. kingdome, which should abolish all the rest, should differ in the truth and sinceritie of religion from them: but it is not necessarie, that the foure Monarchies one destroying and confounding another, should be of diuerse religi∣on: for kingdomes that are of the same superstition, may be one enemie vnto another, as one error may be contrary to another.

3. Argum. It is said of this kingdome, that it shall not be giuen vnto an other: but the Turke now possesseth a great part of the kingdome of Christians: And among themselues also religion is diuided, and many distast the Gospel; therefore this cannot be vnderstood of the kingdome of Christianitie.

Contra. 1. By this kingdome, which God should raise vp, is not vnderstood any visible or externall kingdome: though the Turke haue surprised the terrene kingdomes and nati∣ons, which sometime the Christians possessed, yet the spirituall kingdome of Christ is not resigned vnto them, nor to any other. 2. Euen among Christians there may be diuisions, and many carnall men may liue in the Church, but they belong not to the spirituall king∣dome of Christ, though they remaine in the externall societie of the visible Church.

4. Argu. If this be the kingdome of Christ, who was borne vnder Augustus Caesar, when the Romane Monarchie in a manner beganne, then the fourth Monarchie, and this

Page 75

fifth kingdome should beginne together, which cannot be, for the one must be the ruine and destruction of the other.

Contra. 1. To this Caluin answereth, that the Monarchie of the Romanes beganne not with the Caesars, but long before, when the Macedonian kingdome was dissolued.

2. But this is an vnsufficient answer: 1. because it was no Monarchie, till the time of Iu∣lius Caesar: but the gouernment before that was sometime Democraticall, & popular, some∣time Aristocraticall, gouerned by Consuls: therefore till it became a Monarchie, it could not be the fourth kingdome here spoken of. 2. Though the fift kingdome and the fourth beganne not together, yet the same inconuenience followeth, if they continue together: for the fift kingdome, when it commeth must be the ruine of the other: this argument therefore of the Rabbine is inuincible against their opinion, which make the Romane Monarchie this fourth kingdome.

3. Therefore to the Rabbines argument we make this further answer, that this fourth kingdome diuided into two, as consisting of two legges, was the Monarchicall state of Sy∣ria and Babylon where the sonnes and ofspring of Seleucu raigned, and of Egypt, where the Ptolomies succeeded one another, as is before shewed, quest. 50. And so indeed this fift kingdome was the ende of the other.

5. Argum. The fourth kingdome and the fift can not stand together, the one beeing the ruine of the other: but vnder Constantine and other Christian Emperours of the Romane state, the Gospel of Christ flourished; therefore it cannot be meant of that kingdome.

Contra. 1. Caluin here answereth, that the kingdome of Christ, non debet referri ad tempus natiuitatis, must not be referred to the time of his natiuitle, but to the preaching of the Gospell: and when the gospell beganne to be published, then the Romane Empire after Traianus time was translated to strangers, to heardmen, and swineards, and beastly monsters.

2. This answer is likewise insufficient: 1. for as soone as Christ was borne, his kingdome beganne in the dayes of his flesh: as the Angel in the annuntiation of Christs birth to the virgine Marie, telleth her, that God would giue him the throne of his father Dauid,* 1.1 and he shall raigne ouer the house of Iacob, &c. 2. the gospel was neuer more published in the world, then in the Apostles time, while yet the Romane Empire continued in the name and stocke of the Caesars. 3. though the Empire was deuolued to strangers, not of Caesars familie, yet was it still the Latine and Romane Empire, and therefore was the same Monarchie.

3. Wherefore vnlesse the Romane Monarchie be disclaimed here from beeing this fourth kingdome, this argument cannot be answered, for the fourth kingdome, and the fift cannot stand together.

6. Argum. The Romane Empire yet in some sort continueth, therefore this fift is not the kingdome of Christ, which must not be raised vntill the other be destroyed.

Contra. The Romane Monarchie is long since dissolued, and there remaineth nothing but an image and shadowe thereof, therefore this reason concludeth not.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.