and when hee speaketh a lye, hee speaketh of his owne, Iohn 8.44. therefore the true Virgins and servants of Christ are thus described: In whose mouth there is found no guile, Apocal. 14. 5. Beside, that which is evill of it selfe in the kinde thereof, cannot any wayes be good: a lye is contrary to the order of nature, which hath given unto man the voyce and words to expresse his minde and the meaning of the heart: Now for authority, against Plato we may set Aristotle, who saith, that a lye is in it selfe evill and wicked, lib. 4. Ethicor. c. 7. and Pythagoras was wont to say, that in these two things wee are made like unto God, in telling the truth, and bestowing of benefits: Aelian. lib. 12. Against Origen and Cassianus we may op∣pose Augustine, who condemneth all kind of lying, even that which is called jocosum, a lye in sport: libr. cont. mendacium, and Gregory, who upon those words of Iob 27.3. As long as my breath is in me, &c. my lips shall speake no wickednesse, nor my tongue utter deceit: inferreth, that omne mendacium est iniquitas, every lye is iniquity, ex Perer.
2. Some thinke that Iacob lied to his father, but that he sinned not, because hee did it by the revelation and counsell of God: so Chrysostome saith, Ne considera, quod mendacia erant, &c. Consider not that they were lyes, which Iacob told, but that God willing to have the prediction fulfilled, dispensed and disposed all things: hom. 53. in Genes. Of the same opinion are Gabriel Biel in 3. distinct. 38. and Petrus Aliacens. Familiari considio spiritus excusantur: They are excused by the familiar counsell of God, 1. Senten. qu. 12.
Contra. 1. If God did perswade Iacob to lye, then hee should be the author of lying, and so of sinne: 2. This will shake the credit of the Scriptures and holy writers, if it bee granted that God inspireth lies. 3. Neither doth it appeare, that this counsell was of God, but of Rebeccahs owne device.
Vers. 8. Heare my voyce my sonne, in that which I command thee. 4. If Iacob had received any revelation from God, he would not have beene so doubtfull as hee was to enterprise this matter. 5. God indeed orde∣red and disposed of this meanes, and made it worke to effect his owne purpose: but God disposeth of ma∣ny things to a good end, which he ordained not, neither commanded.
3. Some thinke that Iacob lied not at all to Isaack, and therefore sinned not: 1. Augustine excuseth Ia∣cobs speech by the mysticall sense: where he saith, I am Esau, he saith, if it be referred to Iacobs person, it is a lye: if to Iacobs body, that is, the Church, it is true: for as the Scripture saith, Many shall come from the East and West, &c. and sit downe with Abraham, Isaack and Iacob in the kingdome of heaven, and the chil∣dren of the kingdome shall be cast out, Matth. 8.11, 12. and so the younger taketh away the birth-right of the elder. 2. Theodoret saith Iacob was Esau, because he had bought his birth-right. 2. So Thom. Anglic. that as Christ said Iohn Baptist was Elias, not in person, but in office and vertue, so Iacob saith he was Esau, in regard of his prerogative and birth-right. 4. Some excuse Iacob, that he should call himselfe Esau, which signifieth made or perfect, signifying that he was the making, that is, the sonne of Isaack, and the first borne by the decree of God, Perer.
Contra. 1. A mysticall or figurative sense in Scripture is not to be admitted, where the historicall may without any inconvenience be received, as here it may; for to grant that Iacob might fall into this infirmi∣ty, is no absurdity, seeing holy men in Scripture are detected of greater faults; and Saint Peter is reproved of Saint Paul for his dissimulation, Galath. 2.
2. Iacob saith not only, I am thy first borne, but Esau thy first borne, vers. 19. and as Cajetan noteth, hee saith, he is Esau, v. 24. without the addition of the first borne; therefore the second answer is not sufficient.
3. The example of Iohn Baptist is not alike, for there they which heard our Saviour, did know that hee meant not Elias person, but some other similitude in respect of his office and gifts; but here Isaack under∣standeth Iacob to speake of the person of Esau, and therefore biddeth him come neare, that he might feele him; they which excuse this fact of Iacobs by that of Raphael to Toby, who said he was Azarias the sonne of Ananias the great, would justifie one lye by another.
4. Esau was so called, for that he was perfectly borne: and therefore Iacob could not in that sense name himselfe Esau; and though he had, yet he had deceived Isaack who inquireth still after the person of Esau.
5. Neither, because Isaack, after he perceived the fraud, was not angry with Iacob, neither did revoke the blessing pronounced; or because the Scripture saith, that Iacob was a plaine or simple man; or for that God appeared afterward to Iacob; doth all this prove, that Iacob committed not a lye; as Thomas An∣glic. objecteth. For 1. God casteth not off his because of some infirmity, neither doth an action awry de∣rogate from a mans uprightnesse and simplicity, and it is confessed, that God over-ruled this action, and disposed of it according to his owne purpose, as God can turne and apply evill actions to a good end: yet all this cannot exempt Iacob from dissimulation.
6. Though this speech of Iacob, I am Esau thy first borne, could find some excuse, yet the other can hard∣ly be made good; I have done as thou badest mee, and eat of my venison; for neither had Isaack given the charge to Iacob, but to Esau; neither was that flesh, which Iacob brought, got in hunting; some would have it understood of some other thing that Isaack had given to Iacob in charge: some say that Iacob re∣spected his fathers generall intention, which was to employ his first borne in that service, and to give him the blessing, and that first borne was himselfe, Cajetan. But who seeth not, how farre fetcht these inter∣pretations are; for it is cleare that Iacob speaketh of his fathers bidding in action, not in intention; and yet he intended as he spake, to blesse Esau and not Iacob; Perer. himselfe confesseth, that these two last speeches of Iacob can very hardly be excused from untruth, howsoever he thinketh the first may: in Gen. 27. Numb. 57.
Wherefore the best solution of this question is, that Iacob told an officious lye to his father: 1. As is evi∣dent by his three speeches; I am Esau thy first borne, and I have done as thou badest mee, and eat of my veni∣son: for none of all these are true. 2. Yet was not this dissimulation of Iacob either injurious to Isaack, for