The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.

Pages

Io. Whitgifte.

Melchisedech being a Priest did exercise ciuill iurisdiction, for he was king of Sa∣lem.* 1.1 Gen 14. Aaron being a Priest did iudge the whole people in temporall matters euen in causes of inheritance. Num. 27. In the. 17. of Deuteronomie, there is a com∣maundement, that ciuill matters of difficultie shal be referred to the Priests and to the iudge. Elye and Samuel Priests did iudge the people in matters temporall.* 1.2 The people of Israell after theyr captiuitie were gouerned by Priestes and Pro∣phetes, as by Esdras, Nehemias, Mattathias. &c. The Scripture in no place commaundeth the contrarie, nor moueth vnto it, & yet you are not ashamed to say, that the holye scriptures doe teache, that ministers oughte not to meddle with ciuill offices.

Lykewyse in Augustines tyme it is euidente by the woordes before recited,* 1.3 that it was not straunge, but vsuall, and counted a péece of duetie for Bishops to deale in Ciuil causes, and that as Iudges. The authours of the Centuries, in the fourth Centur. chap. 7. say that Bishops in that age did giue sentence in ciuil causes, if anye didde appeale from the Ciuill courtes to their authoritie. Sozomene Lib. 1. cap. 9.* 1.4 wryteth thus of Constantine the Emperour. This was a greate argumente of his good affection towardes Christian religion, that he made a lawe for the freedome of clearkes in all places, and also hee gaue libertie for those that were called into iudgemente to ap∣peale to the Bishops, if they were disposed to refuse the ciuill magistrates: and he com∣maunded that their sentence should stand, and be of more force, than the sentence of the* 1.5 other iudges, euen as though it had proceeded from the Emperour hymselfe. And that the Magistrates and their ministers should see that acomplished, that was determined and iudged in suche causes by the Bishops.

Nicephorns lib. 7. cap. 9. maketh mention of one Philaeas a Bishop, that was great∣ly* 1.6 commended, for his wisedome and dexteritic in determining ciuill matters com∣mitted vnto him. Sozomene lib. 6. cap. 32. testifieth of Epiphanius Bishop of Salamine* 1.7 that together with his pastorall office, he was occupyed, and that with greate com∣mendation in ciuill and politike affaires.

Eusebius lib. 7. cap. 32. testifieth, that Dorotheus being a Priest of the Churche of* 1.8 Antioche, and wel learned, did scrue the Emperour in ciuill businesse.

Theodosius the Emperour made a lawe, wherein it was decréed, that all ciuil stryfes and controuersies shoulde be referred to the iudgemente of the churche, if either* 1.9 of the parties did desire it. And the same lawe did Carolus Magnus, afterwards renew and confirme: and yet doe you saye, that the practise of the churche dothe confirme that

Page 774

Bishops may not meddle with ciuill offices.

If you flée to reason: is it not good reason, that a Bishop shoulde haue that of∣fice,* 1.10 and that authoritie, that maye helpe hym, in dooing his duelie, in correctyng vice, in procuryng peace, in maynteyning good order, in cuttyng off sectes, schis∣mes, and suche lyke? in accomplyshing all whiche be that séeth not howe muche he is helped by suche ciuill authoritie, as the Prince committeth vnto hym, is ey∣ther voyde of reason, or wilfully blynded.

Wherfore I may moste iustly conclude, that for so muche as the holye Scriptures* 1.11 doe teache, that Ecclesiasticall persons maye meddle with ciuill effices, the practyso of the Churche confirmeth the same, and reason telleth that it is conuenient: and see∣ing that suche as practise them both in the maner and forme before declared, breake not foorth into any other mannes callyng, busy not themselues in things whiche belong not vnto them, but walke in their callyng, occupie themselues in matters incidents vnto it, and do good seruice both to God, their Prince, and their countrey: these offices may very aptely concurre and meete together in one person, and be profitably linked and ioyned together in one man. This did Augustine confesse, and acknowledgeth that the Apostle hath bounde them to these troubles, not by his owne iudgement, but by* 1.12 iudgement of him that did speake in him: as I haue before declared: This haue the godlie Bishops, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, &c. consented vnto: this doo the graue, wise and learned Bishops in our tyme in this Churche by experience knowe.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.