I do indéed speake of this matter there againe after a sort: for I am driuen vnto it by the order of the Admonition. But in all those words there by me vttered, touching excōmunicatiō, I do not once aske, what maketh this, or what maketh that (as you charge me) although I might iustly vse these kinde of questions, as sufficient answeres, to such vnskilfull quotations, as they paint theyr margent with: and somtimes indéed I make such demaundes, but it is to shewe the fondnesse of their allegations.
I defende no Chauncelors. &c. that vsurpe any office, wherevnto they be not lawfully called, but I woulde not haue the Scriptures abused to confute them, least thereby (séeing the weaknesse of our reasons) they be animated rather to procéede, than perswaded to leaue of. I doe not thinke that Chauncellours ought to excom∣municate (with this kinde of excommunication, that wée talke of) except they bée Ministers, and so muche haue I vttered in my Answere: but I will not disquiet the Church for it, by séeking reformation extraordinarily, neyther will I bée wil∣full, if I can heare any sounde reasons to remoue me from this perswasion: