Chap. 1. the. 7. Diuision.
Besides that, we be called by the example of our sa〈1 line〉〈1 line〉ionce Christ to vse〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 the supper vsual and common bread, for what time our Sauioure Christ celebrated his supper there was no other bread to be gotten but vnleauened bread, there being astraight charge giuen by the law, that there should be then no leauened bread, and it is not to be doubted but that if there had 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉in then when he celebrated his supper, as at other times nothing but leauened bread, he would not haue caused vn∣leauened bread to haue bin made for that purpose of celebrating his supper.
It was not vsuall bread, but properly appoynted for the celebrating of the passo∣uer,* 1.1 and then to be vsed and not otherwise vsually and commonly for their vsuall and common bread was leauened, wherefore this maketh against you, and if you will haue the commaundements that appertethe to the eating of the passouer per∣petuall,* 1.2 and to be referred to the celebrating of the Lords supper, as by that precept 2. Chro. 35. before alleadged, it seemeth you would, then must we make it a matter of necessitie, to haue vnleauened bread: but as that is 〈◊〉〈◊〉, so is this also: for the kind of bread is indifferent, although (as M. Bucer sayth) it commeth nearer to the insti∣tution* 1.3 of Christe to vse vnle〈1 line〉〈1 line〉uened bread, b〈1 line〉〈1 line〉cause he did celebrate his supper with it, if there wer not other circumstances and reasons to moue the Church sometimes to vse the contrary.