The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Io. Whitgifte.

I am constant and agrée with my selfe in the truth I thanke God for it. I knowe the kind of bread to be indifferents my priuate iudgemēt I haue in my Answer vt∣tered. But in such matters I submit my selfe to the determination of the Church, to whome God doth giue his spirit most aboundantly, so long as it followeth and em∣braceth the truth.

The daunger that you speake of, is in the forme, and figure of the bread, not in the other qualities, nor in the substance: and therfore not perteyning to any thing that I haue spoken. For the question is of leauened, or vnleauened breade, not of roundnesse or squarenesse. &c. Although the forme and figure also is indifferente, and in the power of the Churche to appoynt: wherfore there may no schisme or di∣uision in the Churche be made for it.

M. Bucers censures were vpon the firste booke in King Edwards time, not vp∣pon* 1.1 the second, therefore you are deceiued. The Church hath authoritie in things in∣different to abolish or reuoke as occasion serueth: and therefore that circumstance is not worthe the noting.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.